15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Polarization, Antenna Gain <strong>and</strong> Diversity Considerations 6-7<br />

Table 6-2: Coefficients <strong>of</strong> the fade reduction <strong>for</strong>mulation at f = 870 MHz.<br />

El. Angle (°) a0 a1 a2 a3 dB Range<br />

30 -5.020 x 10 -3<br />

0.3354 -2.439 x 10 -2<br />

45 -0.8193 0.8430 -5.758 x 10 -2<br />

60 -0.2305 0.2288 6.773 x 10 -2<br />

Table 6-3: Coefficients <strong>of</strong> the fade reduction <strong>for</strong>mulation at f = 1.5 GHz.<br />

7.764 x 10 -4<br />

1.222 x 10 -3<br />

-3.608 x 10 -3<br />

El. Angle (°) a0 a1 a2 a3 dB Range<br />

30 0.3181 0.26153 -1.573x 10 -2<br />

45 -1.073 0.8816 -4.651 x 10 -2<br />

60 -8.127 x 10 -2<br />

0.2044 5.781 x 10 -2<br />

3.734 x 10 -4<br />

7.942 x 10 -4<br />

-2.235 x 10 -3<br />

It is interesting to note that larger fade reductions occur at the greater elevation angles.<br />

This arises because at the larger angles, a change <strong>of</strong> lanes may radically alter the earthsatellite<br />

path from a shadowed to a non-shadowed state. At the lower elevation angles,<br />

this change <strong>of</strong> state becomes less likely. It is noted from Figure 6-5 that the L-B<strong>and</strong> fade<br />

is reduced from 10 dB to approximately 8 dB, 6 dB, <strong>and</strong> 4.5 dB at 30°, 45°, <strong>and</strong> 60°,<br />

respectively. At UHF (Figure 6-4), the 10 dB fade is reduced to 8 dB, 7 dB, <strong>and</strong> 5 dB at<br />

30°, 45°, <strong>and</strong> 60°, respectively.<br />

6.5 Antenna Separation Diversity Gain<br />

A space diversity simulation has been carried out employing the database corresponding<br />

to 400 km <strong>of</strong> roadside tree shadowing measurements taken during the Australian<br />

campaign [Vogel et al., 1992]. Space diversity operation <strong>for</strong> LMSS configurations may<br />

be envisaged by the scenario <strong>of</strong> two spaced antennas mounted atop a vehicle where each<br />

antenna is fed to a separate receiver system. Because the signal levels at the two<br />

antennas are expected to be different at any instant <strong>of</strong> time, rapid switching between the<br />

two receiver outputs followed by subsequent processing should enable the larger signal to<br />

be accessed. Such a system should there<strong>for</strong>e require smaller fade margins <strong>for</strong> the same<br />

“signal access distance” than single terminal systems. The “signal access distance”<br />

represents that distance over which the received signal level operates within the designed<br />

fade margin.<br />

Questions addressed here are: (1) what is the increase in “signal access distance” as<br />

a function <strong>of</strong> antenna spacing along the driving direction, <strong>and</strong> (2) what is the<br />

improvement in terms <strong>of</strong> reduced fading (enhanced signal) <strong>for</strong> a given “signal access<br />

distance” as a function <strong>of</strong> antenna spacing? The first question is addressed employing the<br />

concept <strong>of</strong> “diversity improvement factor, DIF” <strong>and</strong> the second “diversity gain, DG”,<br />

both <strong>of</strong> which are characterized in the following paragraphs.<br />

2-20<br />

2-12<br />

2-11<br />

3-25<br />

3-17<br />

3-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!