15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10-16<br />

<strong>Propagation</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Vehicular</strong> <strong>and</strong> Personal Mobile Satellite Systems<br />

10.8.2 Diversity Gain Versus Probability <strong>for</strong> Tokyo, London, <strong>and</strong> Singapore<br />

In Figure 10-13 is given the diversity gain versus probability <strong>for</strong> the “Best-Satellite” <strong>and</strong><br />

the joint distribution multiple satellite cases <strong>for</strong> Tokyo. Two types <strong>of</strong> diversity gains are<br />

shown plotted; namely one corresponding to “h<strong>and</strong><strong>of</strong>f” (solid) <strong>and</strong> the other to<br />

“combining” (dashed) as previously described. The diversity gain is defined here as the<br />

fade difference between the highest satellite <strong>and</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the other scenario distributions at<br />

a fixed probability level. For example, at the 10% probability in Figure 10-10, the<br />

Highest-Satellite <strong>and</strong> Best-Satellite fade levels exceeded are approximately 22 dB <strong>and</strong><br />

15 dB, respectively. The difference in these fade levels corresponds to a diversity gain <strong>of</strong><br />

7 dB at a probability <strong>of</strong> 10% as noted in Figure 10-13. The diversity gains <strong>for</strong> the other<br />

distributions are analogously derived.<br />

The following results may be gleaned from Figure 10-13: (1) The diversity gain<br />

differences (at any probability) between “h<strong>and</strong><strong>of</strong>f” <strong>and</strong> “combining” methodologies are<br />

generally smaller than 1 dB. (2) For probabilities down to approximately 20%, the “Best<br />

Satellite” diversity gain is within 1.5 dB <strong>of</strong> the other multiple satellite cases. (3) At the<br />

10% level, the multiple satellite cases give 3 to 5 dB improvement in the diversity gain<br />

relative to the Best Satellite.<br />

The London diversity gain curves are similar to those <strong>of</strong> Tokyo except<br />

approximately 1 to 2 dB lower because the “Highest” satellite reference distribution is<br />

shifted to the left (as shown in Figure 10-6). This occurs predominantly because the<br />

average satellite elevation <strong>of</strong> the highest satellite is 52° <strong>for</strong> London as compared to 40°<br />

<strong>for</strong> Tokyo.<br />

Diversity Gain (dB)<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

3 Best Satellites<br />

Diversity Type<br />

Dashed: Combining<br />

Solid: H<strong>and</strong>-<strong>of</strong>f<br />

20 10<br />

Probability (%)<br />

4 Best Satellites<br />

2 Best Satellites<br />

Best Satellite<br />

Figure 10-13: Path diversity gains at 1.5 GHz derived from distributions <strong>for</strong> the<br />

simulated Globalstar constellation with “combining” <strong>and</strong> “h<strong>and</strong><strong>of</strong>f” diversity <strong>for</strong> Tokyo,<br />

Japan.<br />

5<br />

2<br />

1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!