15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8-32<br />

<strong>Propagation</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Vehicular</strong> <strong>and</strong> Personal Mobile Satellite Systems<br />

(fourth column), <strong>and</strong> the originating reference is listed in the last column. Similar type<br />

results are given in Table 8-19 <strong>for</strong> the site location with the highest fading (again with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> Site 6 as mentioned above). We may conclude that; (1) fade margins <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least 30 dB (e.g., mean loss plus two st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations) are required to achieve<br />

relatively reliable communications <strong>for</strong> most cases vis-à-vis the overall average fading,<br />

<strong>and</strong> (2) 40 dB are required <strong>for</strong> the worst case sites.<br />

Table 8-18: Summary <strong>of</strong> relative power losses in terms <strong>of</strong> overall average <strong>of</strong> worst case<br />

fading (all site average with exception <strong>of</strong> Site 6 <strong>for</strong> the first row).<br />

Mean (dB)<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Dev. (dB)<br />

Median<br />

Loss (dB )<br />

-10.2 5.8 -13.0<br />

-15.1 6.5 -14.5<br />

Tables<br />

Table 8-3,<br />

Table 8-4<br />

Table 8-9,<br />

Table 8-8<br />

Freq. Interval<br />

(GHz)<br />

Reference<br />

0.7-1.8 V&T [1993]<br />

1.6, 2.5<br />

V&T<br />

[1995a,b]<br />

-11.9 7.4 Table 8-14 0.5-3.0 V&T [1995c]<br />

-9.1 3.0 Table 8-17 0.86-2.57 Wells [1977]<br />

Table 8-19: Summary <strong>of</strong> relative power losses in terms <strong>of</strong> worst site location.<br />

Site<br />

Mean<br />

(dB)<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

Deviation<br />

(dB)<br />

Median<br />

Loss<br />

(dB )<br />

Frequency<br />

Interval<br />

(GHz)<br />

Reference<br />

Commons -15.4 8.4 -18.0 0.7-1.8 V. &T. [1993]<br />

Commons -19.9 8.1 -18.6 1.6, 2.5 V. & T. [1995a,b]<br />

House -19.5 11.6 0.5-3.0 V. & T. [1995c]<br />

8.7.2 Fading Dependence on Frequency<br />

8.7.2.1 Small <strong>and</strong> Large B<strong>and</strong>widths <strong>Effects</strong><br />

The relative signal level may dramatically vary as the frequency is swept over intervals <strong>of</strong><br />

100 MHz due to multipath variability. An example <strong>of</strong> this variability is depicted by the<br />

fixed position frequency sweep in Figure 8-1, where the signal varies from -25 dB to<br />

0 dB over the frequency interval 900 MHz to 1000 MHz, respectively. On the other<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, the trend fading over larger b<strong>and</strong>s between 0.5 GHz to 3.0 GHz is generally small<br />

when the short frequency scale fluctuations are averaged. It may be deduced from Figure<br />

8-19, that <strong>for</strong> five <strong>of</strong> the six sites the fade increased by only 3 dB <strong>and</strong> less over a 1 GHz<br />

frequency span. This fade increase is considered small compared to the smaller scale<br />

variability <strong>of</strong> fading over 100 MHz as shown in Figure 8-18. Wells [1977] also showed<br />

from direct earth-satellite measurements that small increases <strong>of</strong> the average fading<br />

occurred over the frequency interval between 0.86 <strong>and</strong> 2.57 GHz. From Table 8-17, the<br />

overall average fade increase over this b<strong>and</strong> is indicated to be less than 3 dB.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!