15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3-30<br />

<strong>Propagation</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Vehicular</strong> <strong>and</strong> Personal Mobile Satellite Systems<br />

3.7.4 ITU-R Fade Model at Elevation Angles above 60°<br />

The ITU-R has recommended that <strong>for</strong> elevation angles greater than 60°, the ERS model<br />

be linearly interpolated with the fade values listed in Table 3-2 (at 80°) <strong>and</strong> plotted in<br />

Figure 3-28 <strong>for</strong> the frequencies <strong>of</strong> 1.6 GHz or 2.6 GHz at the indicated percentages [ITU-<br />

R, 1994]. The tabulated values in the right two columns <strong>of</strong> Table 3-2 were derived from<br />

measurements described by Smith et al. [1993]. We have extended this methodology<br />

below to apply to the <strong>for</strong>mulation (3-1) employing the following steps:<br />

1. Apply equation (3-1) at the frequency <strong>of</strong> 1.6 GHz <strong>and</strong> 2.6 GHz at an elevation angle<br />

<strong>of</strong> 60° (values in the second <strong>and</strong> third columns).<br />

2. Linearly interpolate between the fade calculated <strong>for</strong> an angle <strong>of</strong> 60° <strong>and</strong> the fade <strong>for</strong><br />

an elevation angle <strong>of</strong> 80° provided in Table 3-2 (second <strong>and</strong> fourth columns) at<br />

1.6 GHz.<br />

3. Linearly interpolate between the value calculated <strong>for</strong> an angle <strong>of</strong> 60° <strong>and</strong> the fade<br />

values <strong>for</strong> an elevation angle <strong>of</strong> 80° provided in Table 3-2 at 2.6 GHz (third <strong>and</strong> fifth<br />

columns) only <strong>for</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> 15% <strong>and</strong> smaller.<br />

4. Linearly interpolate between the values in the fourth <strong>and</strong> fifth columns in Table 3-2<br />

<strong>and</strong> a value <strong>of</strong> zero at 90° to arrive at fade levels at elevation angles between 80 ° <strong>and</strong><br />

90 ° .<br />

The above methodology is self-consistent at 1.5 GHz <strong>for</strong> percentages between 1% <strong>and</strong><br />

30% in that the 60° elevation fade values derived from the EERS model are larger than<br />

the respective tabulated 80° fade values at the same percentages. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, this<br />

is not the case at 2.6 GHz <strong>for</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> 20% <strong>and</strong> larger (see columns three <strong>and</strong> five<br />

<strong>of</strong> Table 3-2 showing values with *). It is there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that at 2.6 GHz the above<br />

methodology be used at percentages <strong>of</strong> 15% <strong>and</strong> smaller as stated in Step 3 above. In<br />

Figure 3-29 is shown plotted the L-B<strong>and</strong> (1.5 GHz) fade exceeded versus elevation angle<br />

showing linear interpolation <strong>of</strong> fades between angles 60° <strong>and</strong> 90°.<br />

Table 3-2: Fades exceeded at elevations <strong>of</strong> 60° <strong>and</strong> 80°.<br />

Percentage, P<br />

EERS Fade (dB) at<br />

Elevation = 60°<br />

Fade (dB) at<br />

Elevation = 80°<br />

f = 1.6 GHz f = 2.6 GHz f = 1.6 GHz f = 2.6 GHz<br />

1 8.2 11.0 4.1 9.0<br />

5 4.8 6.5 2.0 5.2<br />

10 3.4 4.5 1.5 3.8<br />

15 2.6 3.4 1.4 3.2<br />

20 1.9 2.6* 1.3 2.8*<br />

30 1.4 1.8* 1.2 2.5*

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!