15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Earth-Satellite <strong>Propagation</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> Inside Buildings 8-13<br />

co-polarized measurements, the experimental procedures were repeated with crosspolarized<br />

receiving antennas in order to establish the efficacy <strong>of</strong> frequency reuse<br />

employing multiple polarizations.<br />

Measurements were made into six different buildings during the Fall <strong>of</strong> 1994. The<br />

names <strong>of</strong> these buildings, pertinent construction details, <strong>and</strong> the path elevation angles are<br />

given in Table 8-7. EERL, The Commons, <strong>and</strong> the Farmhouse were previously referred<br />

to by Vogel <strong>and</strong> Torrence [1993] (Section 8.2) as Sites 1, 3, <strong>and</strong> 5, respectively in Table<br />

8-2.<br />

The van with processing instrumentation <strong>and</strong> mounted tower was placed outside <strong>of</strong><br />

each <strong>of</strong> the buildings, <strong>and</strong> transmissions from the radiating antenna simulated those<br />

emanating from a satellite. Each experiment included a calibration procedure during<br />

which the co-polarized power level was measured outside the building. This co-polarized<br />

power level was used as a relative reference (clear line-<strong>of</strong>-sight) <strong>of</strong> the power<br />

measurement interior to the building.<br />

Table 8-7: Building characteristics <strong>and</strong> measurement parameters.<br />

Building<br />

Name<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

Construction<br />

Construction<br />

Type<br />

Ro<strong>of</strong><br />

Type<br />

Avg. El.(°)<br />

Commons 1987 concrete tilt wall tar 16 16<br />

EERL Office 1944 block brick tar 30 8.8<br />

Farmhouse 1880 wood frame wood shingle 57 19.2<br />

House 1958 wood frame composition 40 12<br />

Motel 1980 brick composition 26 8<br />

Store 1967 steel frame tar 37 16<br />

8.3.2 Stability <strong>of</strong> Measurement<br />

Distance<br />

Meas. (m)<br />

An example <strong>of</strong> a 50 second time series <strong>of</strong> power is given in Figure 8-7 <strong>for</strong> L- <strong>and</strong><br />

S-B<strong>and</strong>s <strong>for</strong> the Commons <strong>for</strong> both co-polarized <strong>and</strong> cross-polarized levels at fixed<br />

antenna positions. The st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>for</strong> the case shown is less than 0.2 dB at<br />

L-B<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> S-B<strong>and</strong>s. Similar stability measurements were executed at the five other<br />

sites <strong>and</strong> the overall average <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations was less than 0.5 dB at both<br />

frequencies. This variability is a measure <strong>of</strong> the uncertainty in the measurements <strong>and</strong><br />

reflects system stability, possible transmitter motion, people motion, <strong>and</strong> ambient<br />

interference.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!