15.07.2013 Views

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

Handbook of Propagation Effects for Vehicular and ... - Courses

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Maritime-Mobile Satellite <strong>Propagation</strong> <strong>Effects</strong> 9-5<br />

The measurements <strong>of</strong> Karasawa <strong>and</strong> Shiokawa were sufficiently scattered such that they<br />

fell within the bounds <strong>of</strong> both (9-13) <strong>and</strong> (9-14).<br />

The level <strong>of</strong> the maximum coherent component PCO <strong>of</strong> the reflected wave may be<br />

determined by varying the antenna height on board the ship during calm sea conditions.<br />

By determining the level difference between the minimum <strong>and</strong> maximum signals (<strong>for</strong> a<br />

calm sea), the intensity <strong>of</strong> the coherent component <strong>of</strong> the scattered wave relative to the<br />

direct wave component can be evaluated. The intensity <strong>of</strong> the incoherent component <strong>of</strong><br />

the scattered wave may be obtained through the assumption that the incoherent signal<br />

follows a Nakagami-Rice distribution. Figure 9-1 shows the relation between the fading<br />

depth <strong>and</strong> the mean total multipath power relative to the direct signal power assuming<br />

this distribution. Karasawa <strong>and</strong> Shiokawa [1984] define the “fading depth” as the dB<br />

difference between the signal level <strong>of</strong> the direct incident wave <strong>and</strong> a threshold level that<br />

the resultant signal level exceeds with a probability <strong>of</strong> P percent <strong>of</strong> the time. The<br />

individual curves denote the indicated probability <strong>of</strong> exceeding the ordinate fading depth.<br />

Shipborne experiments carried out by Karasawa <strong>and</strong> Shiokawa [1988] have corroborated<br />

use <strong>of</strong> this distribution <strong>for</strong> values <strong>of</strong> u ≥ 2. As an illustration <strong>of</strong> the dependence <strong>of</strong> u on<br />

wave-height, Figure 9-2 is a plot <strong>of</strong> u given by (9-5) versus the RMS wave height h<br />

(upper abscissa) <strong>and</strong> significant wave height H (lower abscissa). We note that at θ o = 5°,<br />

u ≥ 2 implies H > 1.5 m <strong>and</strong> h > 0.4 m.<br />

Fading Depthl (dB)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

-10<br />

-12<br />

1%<br />

10%<br />

50%<br />

90%<br />

99%<br />

-20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5<br />

Relative Multipath Power Level (dB)<br />

Figure 9-1: Fading depth versus total multipath power relative to the direct signal level<br />

<strong>for</strong> different exceedance probabilities (<strong>of</strong> the incoherent level) based on the Nakagami-<br />

Rice distribution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!