Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
K ALJENAIE<br />
3.2 Data Analysis<br />
<strong>The</strong> samples were directly transcribed to avoid forgett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />
to avoid overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> tap<strong>in</strong>g and transcrib<strong>in</strong>g different subjects. It is<br />
better that the <strong>in</strong>vestigator is the transcriber, because she was present and<br />
familiar with all the detail about the session and the activities. Most<br />
importantly, the <strong>in</strong>vestigator knows the children well and understands them<br />
well. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g said by or to the child was <strong>in</strong>cluded, as well as<br />
commentary about the object used by the child. Besides this, l<strong>in</strong>guistic as<br />
well as contextual <strong>in</strong>formation was noted. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigator ignored the<br />
peculiar properties <strong>of</strong> child pronunciation whenever these do not bear<br />
crucially on the issues <strong>of</strong> the research discussed. All the transcriptions<br />
were executed on computer which helped to adm<strong>in</strong>ister the computer<br />
analysis program. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigator used a computer program called SALT<br />
(Systematic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Language Transcripts) developed by Miller &<br />
Chapman (1993), which provides frequencies and general measures like<br />
mean length <strong>of</strong> utterance (MLU). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> Tense and Agreement are<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on total utterances, exclud<strong>in</strong>g imitations as well as rout<strong>in</strong>es<br />
and formulae.<br />
4. Results<br />
Sara<br />
<strong>The</strong> first session was productive <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> utterances as well<br />
as the type <strong>of</strong> data, as it will be presented below. In sample 4, the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> utterances dropped to 194 for no particular reason other than that she<br />
wanted to play more than to chat. In sample 6, the number went up to 294<br />
when that record<strong>in</strong>g took place at her home with the presence <strong>of</strong> her<br />
mother and one <strong>of</strong> her sisters. Aga<strong>in</strong> the number slightly dropped <strong>in</strong> sample<br />
7 when she went back to the nursery after the holiday. S<strong>in</strong>ce then the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> utterances <strong>in</strong>creased gradually till it reached its peak at 406 <strong>in</strong><br />
the f<strong>in</strong>al sample. <strong>The</strong>re is a gap <strong>of</strong> more than a month between sample 5<br />
and 6 due to the holidays. She was recorded at home and remarkably the<br />
change <strong>of</strong> the sett<strong>in</strong>gs and the presence <strong>of</strong> two members <strong>of</strong> Sara’s family<br />
did not affect her performance <strong>in</strong> a negative way.<br />
8