19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

K ALJENAIE<br />

3.2 Data Analysis<br />

<strong>The</strong> samples were directly transcribed to avoid forgett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation and<br />

to avoid overlapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> tap<strong>in</strong>g and transcrib<strong>in</strong>g different subjects. It is<br />

better that the <strong>in</strong>vestigator is the transcriber, because she was present and<br />

familiar with all the detail about the session and the activities. Most<br />

importantly, the <strong>in</strong>vestigator knows the children well and understands them<br />

well. Everyth<strong>in</strong>g said by or to the child was <strong>in</strong>cluded, as well as<br />

commentary about the object used by the child. Besides this, l<strong>in</strong>guistic as<br />

well as contextual <strong>in</strong>formation was noted. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigator ignored the<br />

peculiar properties <strong>of</strong> child pronunciation whenever these do not bear<br />

crucially on the issues <strong>of</strong> the research discussed. All the transcriptions<br />

were executed on computer which helped to adm<strong>in</strong>ister the computer<br />

analysis program. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigator used a computer program called SALT<br />

(Systematic Analysis <strong>of</strong> Language Transcripts) developed by Miller &<br />

Chapman (1993), which provides frequencies and general measures like<br />

mean length <strong>of</strong> utterance (MLU). <strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> Tense and Agreement are<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly based on total utterances, exclud<strong>in</strong>g imitations as well as rout<strong>in</strong>es<br />

and formulae.<br />

4. Results<br />

Sara<br />

<strong>The</strong> first session was productive <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> utterances as well<br />

as the type <strong>of</strong> data, as it will be presented below. In sample 4, the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> utterances dropped to 194 for no particular reason other than that she<br />

wanted to play more than to chat. In sample 6, the number went up to 294<br />

when that record<strong>in</strong>g took place at her home with the presence <strong>of</strong> her<br />

mother and one <strong>of</strong> her sisters. Aga<strong>in</strong> the number slightly dropped <strong>in</strong> sample<br />

7 when she went back to the nursery after the holiday. S<strong>in</strong>ce then the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> utterances <strong>in</strong>creased gradually till it reached its peak at 406 <strong>in</strong><br />

the f<strong>in</strong>al sample. <strong>The</strong>re is a gap <strong>of</strong> more than a month between sample 5<br />

and 6 due to the holidays. She was recorded at home and remarkably the<br />

change <strong>of</strong> the sett<strong>in</strong>gs and the presence <strong>of</strong> two members <strong>of</strong> Sara’s family<br />

did not affect her performance <strong>in</strong> a negative way.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!