19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SALIENCE IN LANGUAGE CHANGE<br />

‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor <strong>in</strong> language change:<br />

evidence from dialect levell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> urban England 1<br />

Paul Kerswill and Ann Williams<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> L<strong>in</strong>guistic Science, <strong>The</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Read<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Abstract. <strong>The</strong> article considers the notion <strong>of</strong> salience as applied <strong>in</strong> the<br />

explanation <strong>of</strong> language change through dialect contact, focus<strong>in</strong>g particularly on<br />

Trudgill’s 1986 exploration <strong>of</strong> the idea. <strong>The</strong> article opens with a discussion <strong>of</strong><br />

six studies which have explicitly used ‘salience’ <strong>in</strong> an explanatory capacity.<br />

This leads to the conclusion that the factors <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> salience are many and<br />

varied. <strong>The</strong>re follows a critique <strong>of</strong> Trudgill’s salience model; while problems<br />

(ma<strong>in</strong>ly to do with circularity) are identified, Trudgill’s model is considered to<br />

be testable. Data from a study <strong>of</strong> dialect levell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> England shows that, while<br />

language-<strong>in</strong>ternal factors play a part, it is <strong>in</strong> the end sociodemographic and other<br />

language-external factors that account for the salience <strong>of</strong> a particular feature.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, a three-component model <strong>of</strong> salience is presented: first, it is suggested<br />

that salience is only relevant <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> dynamic l<strong>in</strong>guistic phenomena (those<br />

<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> acquisition or change). Second, language-<strong>in</strong>ternal factors are listed,<br />

and third the all-important language-external factors are given. It is suggested<br />

that there are bidirectional causal l<strong>in</strong>ks between the second and third<br />

components.<br />

1. Introduction: dialect contact and language change<br />

A current theme <strong>in</strong> contact l<strong>in</strong>guistics is the <strong>in</strong>terplay between <strong>in</strong>ternal,<br />

external (contact-based) and a range <strong>of</strong> non-l<strong>in</strong>guistic factors <strong>in</strong> language<br />

change (see Jones et al. (eds.) forthcom<strong>in</strong>g). Because <strong>of</strong> the uniqueness <strong>of</strong><br />

every case <strong>of</strong> language change and the problem <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g controls, it is<br />

extremely difficult to predict, for a particular constellation <strong>of</strong> factors, exactly<br />

what the outcome will be. However, <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g their role, there is a great<br />

deal to be ga<strong>in</strong>ed by post hoc argumentation. This article explores some <strong>of</strong><br />

these factors by appeal<strong>in</strong>g to a notion which seems to lie at the cusp <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal and external motivation: that <strong>of</strong> salience, which we can provisionally<br />

def<strong>in</strong>e rather simply as a property <strong>of</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>guistic item or feature that makes it<br />

<strong>in</strong> some way perceptually and cognitively prom<strong>in</strong>ent. Salience is a notion <strong>of</strong><br />

1 We are very grateful to Peter Auer, Jenny Cheshire and Peter Trudgill for valuable comments on earlier<br />

drafts <strong>of</strong> this article. This is a version <strong>of</strong> an article which will appear under the same title <strong>in</strong> Jones et al. (eds.)<br />

(forthcom<strong>in</strong>g).<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!