19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOCIOLINGUISTIC VARIATION AND CHANGE IN URBAN INDIA<br />

variables and the composite lexical variable were used by the four caste<br />

groups <strong>in</strong> different ways to mark caste identity. This key f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Pune<br />

study, far from affirm<strong>in</strong>g the notion <strong>of</strong> ‘caste dialects’, provides substantial<br />

evidence for sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic change 5 <strong>in</strong> progress. <strong>The</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> observations <strong>in</strong><br />

this regard may be summarised as follows:<br />

(1) <strong>The</strong> trend among the non-Brahm<strong>in</strong> children is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g<br />

convergence towards the standard dialect. <strong>The</strong> shift towards the standard<br />

phonological and lexical features is led by the children <strong>of</strong> the Backward<br />

caste group. <strong>The</strong> Maratha children were found to reta<strong>in</strong> more vernacular<br />

features. <strong>The</strong> sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic position <strong>of</strong> the Scheduled children <strong>in</strong> the Pune<br />

data is more ambivalent: <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> (ASPI_M_F) and (N) they occupy a<br />

position that is <strong>in</strong>termediate between those <strong>of</strong> the Marathas and the<br />

Backward castes. In the frequent non-standard use <strong>of</strong> the lexical items<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the composite variable the Scheduled group children lag beh<strong>in</strong>d<br />

the two other non-Brahm<strong>in</strong> groups.<br />

Probable <strong>in</strong>terpretations <strong>of</strong> the differential diffusion <strong>of</strong> the standard<br />

dialect features among the non-Brahm<strong>in</strong>s may be found <strong>in</strong> the social history<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Marathi region. Commentators on contemporary Indian society agree<br />

that there is an urgent desire for respectability among the Backward castes,<br />

who for generations had been consigned to social denigration. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> society are us<strong>in</strong>g language as well as the anonymity <strong>of</strong> city life to<br />

discard their traditional caste status. <strong>The</strong> Scheduled group children appear to<br />

be mov<strong>in</strong>g towards the l<strong>in</strong>guistic standard along the same axes as the group<br />

<strong>of</strong> Backward castes, but from a po<strong>in</strong>t farthest from the standard and from the<br />

standard-speak<strong>in</strong>g social group. <strong>The</strong> ambivalent pattern noted above <strong>in</strong> the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the standard l<strong>in</strong>guistic variables by the Scheduled group children may<br />

be a consequence <strong>of</strong> this social fact.<br />

By contrast, the traditionally prestigious Marathas, who are known to<br />

be proud <strong>of</strong> their high status <strong>in</strong> the traditional social order, do not appear to<br />

feel as much pressure as the Backward and Scheduled groups to change their<br />

speech <strong>in</strong> the direction <strong>of</strong> the accepted standard. Alternatively (and more<br />

tentatively) it may be suggested that the prestigious Marathas (or the high<br />

caste non-Brahm<strong>in</strong>s) mark their position <strong>in</strong> opposition to the Brahm<strong>in</strong>s by<br />

shift<strong>in</strong>g the least towards the standard dialect. So, we have here a case where<br />

features <strong>of</strong> the non-standard dialect are be<strong>in</strong>g used as a ‘badge <strong>of</strong> identity’<br />

5 <strong>The</strong> term ‘sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic change’ needs to be used here with some caution. No adult speakers <strong>of</strong> the language<br />

were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study and hence no cross-generational comparative data could be generated. But us<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

volum<strong>in</strong>ous literature document<strong>in</strong>g caste differences <strong>in</strong> the language as a basis for comparison, the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

term becomes legitimate.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!