Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P. COUTSOUGERA Plural Plural Singular forms Gloss Underlying forms Surface forms [le'pi] ‘scale’ /lepi+a/ ! [le'pca] [ma'ti] ‘eye' /mati+a/ ! [ma'θa] [ela'fi] ‘deer’ /elafi+a/ ! [ela'fca] [po'1i] ‘foot’ /po1i+a/ ! [po'θca] [2e'ri] ‘hand’ /xeri+a/ ! [2e'rka] (ii) in reduced underlying CCiV clusters (in postconsonantal, prevocalic position): Plural Plural Singular forms Gloss Underlying forms Surface forms [xarti'] ‘paper’ /xarti+a/ ! [xarca'] [ale'vri] ‘flour’ /alevri+a/ ! [ale'fka] 4 or [ale'rka] Gloss Underlying forms Surface forms ‘heart’ /kar1ia/ ! [karca'] ‘beauty’ /omorfia/ ! [omorca'] The latter are not examples of singular/plural alternations but there are good reasons for claiming that also surface [karca], ‘heart’ and [omorfca'], ‘beauty’ (both singular) have the underlying forms /kar1ia/ and /omorfia/ respectively. b. When in postconsonantal, prevocalic position and following a sonorant (other than r) or the fricatives /s/ and /z/, high vowel i coalesces with the consonant preceding it. This results in palatalisation. Note that all consonants coalescing with i are [+coronal]: 4 [ale'fka] is attested in Mesarka and [ale'rka] in Pafos (regions of Cyprus). [ale'vria] is the contemporary standard form. 26
OPACITY AND SYMPATHY THEORY Plural Plural Singular forms Gloss Underlying forms Surface forms [lemo'ni] ‘lemon’ /lemoni+a/ ! [lemo'$a] [mali'] ‘hair’ /mali+a/ ! [ma%a'] or [ma&a'] [krasi'] ‘wine’ /krasi+a/ ! [kra2a'] [maxazi'] ‘shop’ /ma(azi+a/ ! [maxa;a'] c. i remains syllabic in unreduced CCiV clusters: Gloss Underlying forms Surface forms ‘ploughs’ /aletria/ ! [ale'tria] ‘far’ /makria/ ! [makria'] ‘I need’ /xriazume/ ! [xria'zume] ‘light’ (adj.fem) /elafria/ ! [elafria'] ‘flour’ (pl.) /alevria/ ! [ale'vria] ‘old woman’ /(ria/ ! [(ria'] ‘nets’ /1ixtia/ ! [1i'xtia] Cypriot Greek, unlike Standard Mainland Greek (henceforth SMG), exhibits a consistency in its phonological system. The behaviour of high vowel i and its ‘reflexes’ is perfectly predictable. In SMG, where patterns of the high variety Katharevusa and the low variety Demotiki (Demotic) co-exist, the phonological behaviour of i and j is not always predictable and their distribution is at times highly erratic. SMG exhibits alternative syllabifications on a large scale and neither stress nor syllable structure constraints are capable of accounting for it. There are cases in which i freely alternates with j 5 , such as in [sxoli'o], [sxoljo'], ‘school’ while in other cases only one of the two - i.e. either i or j - is allowed to surface, despite the fact that the structural environments are similar or identical: 5 In SMG i semivocalises postconsonantally and prevocalically (or is sometimes fricativised) but does not strengthen to a stop. 27
Page 1 and 2: Reading Working Papers in Linguisti
Page 3: Reading Working Papers in Linguisti
Page 6 and 7: K ALJENAIE testing ground. To what
Page 8 and 9: K ALJENAIE causative form is basica
Page 10 and 11: K ALJENAIE person diagram, the two
Page 12 and 13: K ALJENAIE 3.2 Data Analysis The sa
Page 14 and 15: K ALJENAIE Table 4 Osama’s longit
Page 16 and 17: K ALJENAIE The asterisk indicates t
Page 18 and 19: K ALJENAIE which is the transitive
Page 20 and 21: K ALJENAIE confirming Hyams (1986)
Page 22 and 23: K ALJENAIE Table 12 Sara’s realiz
Page 24 and 25: K ALJENAIE Table 15 Number of Infle
Page 26 and 27: K ALJENAIE masculine forms are cons
Page 28 and 29: K ALJENAIE Motar, A. (1969). Khasai
Page 32 and 33: P. COUTSOUGERA e.g. [peδja'] *[pe
Page 34 and 35: P. COUTSOUGERA Tableau 1: Opacity i
Page 36 and 37: P. COUTSOUGERA As can be seen, in r
Page 38 and 39: P. COUTSOUGERA 6.1 Selection of the
Page 40 and 41: P. COUTSOUGERA /alevr-I-a/ Tableau
Page 42 and 43: P. COUTSOUGERA different areas of t
Page 44 and 45: P. COUTSOUGERA ruled out as it viol
Page 46 and 47: P. COUTSOUGERA operation McCarthy p
Page 48 and 49: P. COUTSOUGERA Tableau 6: Applicati
Page 50 and 51: P. COUTSOUGERA References Anderson,
Page 52 and 53: R. INGHAM cognitive deficits. They
Page 54 and 55: R. INGHAM 2. Subjects and hypothese
Page 56 and 57: R. INGHAM good as their CA matches
Page 58 and 59: R. INGHAM 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
Page 60 and 61: R. INGHAM Did the [+LD] group perfo
Page 62 and 63: R. INGHAM using the Wilcoxon ranked
Page 64 and 65: R. INGHAM representations but also
Page 66 and 67: R. INGHAM Van der Lely, H., & L. St
Page 68 and 69: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS some vene
Page 70 and 71: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS far soone
Page 72 and 73: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS outside l
Page 74 and 75: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS 3. Intern
Page 76 and 77: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS • Varia
Page 78 and 79: P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS Despite s
Page 80 and 81:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS naturalne
Page 82 and 83:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS apparent
Page 84 and 85:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS Summary f
Page 86 and 87:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS Table 2 T
Page 88 and 89:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS regard it
Page 90 and 91:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS The ‘gr
Page 92 and 93:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS Table 4 (
Page 94 and 95:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS sociodemo
Page 96 and 97:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS Bardovi-H
Page 98 and 99:
P. KERSWILL & A. WILLIAMS språkfö
Page 100 and 101:
S. KULKARNI in the Indian caste hie
Page 102 and 103:
S. KULKARNI ideologies, each emphas
Page 104 and 105:
S. KULKARNI century. The Sabha was,
Page 106 and 107:
S. KULKARNI The main study includes
Page 108 and 109:
S. KULKARNI 4. Quantitative Analyse
Page 110 and 111:
S. KULKARNI comparatively lower (in
Page 112 and 113:
S. KULKARNI Table 3: Percentage use
Page 114 and 115:
S. KULKARNI showing an almost compl
Page 116 and 117:
S. KULKARNI 50 mean % std. score 40
Page 118 and 119:
S. KULKARNI 100 mean % std. score 9
Page 120 and 121:
S. KULKARNI Marathi the kin term /m
Page 122 and 123:
S. KULKARNI not by the less-privile
Page 124 and 125:
S. KULKARNI Bapuji, B.R. (1994).
Page 126 and 127:
S. KULKARNI Sastry, J.V. (1993). Re
Page 128 and 129:
J. MARSHALL 2. Change versus Resist
Page 130 and 131:
J. MARSHALL have become more expose
Page 132 and 133:
J. MARSHALL anthropologists. As man
Page 134 and 135:
J. MARSHALL for data such as Milroy
Page 136 and 137:
J. MARSHALL To some extent, [networ
Page 138 and 139:
J. MARSHALL these close-knit ties a
Page 140 and 141:
J. MARSHALL Life mode 1. Life modes
Page 142 and 143:
J. MARSHALL There are, however, som
Page 144 and 145:
J. MARSHALL can choose a high level
Page 146 and 147:
J. MARSHALL Pedersen therefore, lik
Page 148 and 149:
J. MARSHALL case that these people
Page 150 and 151:
J. MARSHALL 6. Research Question an
Page 152 and 153:
J. MARSHALL ‘are high in frequenc
Page 154 and 155:
J. MARSHALL 6.5. Morphological Vari
Page 156 and 157:
J. MARSHALL 4 Do you work/go to sch
Page 158 and 159:
J. MARSHALL 8) I never eat brose or
Page 160 and 161:
J. MARSHALL mentioned, a ‘real ti
Page 162 and 163:
J. MARSHALL 3. LEXREC. This is an i
Page 164 and 165:
J. MARSHALL which comes nearest to
Page 166 and 167:
J. MARSHALL LIFMODLEXREC 60 50 40 L
Page 168 and 169:
J. MARSHALL the different tests wer
Page 170 and 171:
J. MARSHALL PHOVAR = 21.1 + 0.573 A
Page 172 and 173:
J. MARSHALL There is no significant
Page 174 and 175:
J. MARSHALL 7.6. SOCNET as a Predic
Page 176 and 177:
J. MARSHALL SOCNET is again not sig
Page 178 and 179:
J. MARSHALL integrated sociolinguis
Page 180 and 181:
I. SINKA, M. GARMAN AND C. SCHELLET
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
show all

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?