19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SALIENCE IN LANGUAGE CHANGE<br />

language change and variation, the l<strong>in</strong>guistic features are items be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

transferred from one language variety to another through diffusion;<br />

however, diffusion-type mechanisms may hold for the other types <strong>of</strong><br />

phenomena as well.<br />

2. language-<strong>in</strong>ternal explanations, such as the presence <strong>of</strong> phonological<br />

contrast, great phonetic distance, <strong>in</strong>ternally-def<strong>in</strong>ed naturalness,<br />

semantic transparency, or a particular syntactic or prosodic<br />

environment<br />

3. language-external cognitive, pragmatic, <strong>in</strong>teractional, social<br />

psychological, and sociodemographic factors. Some have a natural l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

with the l<strong>in</strong>guistic features be<strong>in</strong>g adopted (e.g., that between a syntactic<br />

feature and its pragmatic function), while others have an arbitrary<br />

relationship (e.g., the favour<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> one vowel quality over another)<br />

Note that the list given under component 1 covers only a portion <strong>of</strong> what<br />

might be termed ‘l<strong>in</strong>guistic phenomena’. In particular, non-dynamic<br />

phenomena are excluded, such as grammatical or phonological theory and<br />

description (unless the focus is on a change from state A to state B),<br />

aphasiology and acquisition <strong>in</strong> relation to l<strong>in</strong>guistic theory, descriptions <strong>of</strong><br />

language changes where contact is not be<strong>in</strong>g discussed, much <strong>of</strong> articulatory<br />

phonetics, and some areas <strong>of</strong> psychol<strong>in</strong>guistic process<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> at least one element taken from component 2 appears<br />

to be a precondition for salience. Certa<strong>in</strong> elements are gradient, others<br />

categorical. Component 3 is essential if we are to avoid circularity, and is<br />

ultimately the cause <strong>of</strong> salience. Components 2 and 3 are l<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>in</strong> complex<br />

ways, sometimes natural, sometimes arbitrary. <strong>The</strong>re will <strong>of</strong>ten be a causal<br />

relationship between components 2 and 3, though the direction <strong>of</strong> causality<br />

will depend on the particular case. However, it is the language-external<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> component 3 that <strong>in</strong> the end directly motivate speakers to behave <strong>in</strong><br />

a certa<strong>in</strong> way, and are therefore central to the salience notion.<br />

References<br />

Auer, Peter, Barden, Birgit & Grosskopf, Beate (1998). Subjective and objective<br />

parameters determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ‘salience’ <strong>in</strong> long-term dialect accommodation. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics 2:163-187.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!