Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
P. COUTSOUGERA<br />
6.1 Selection <strong>of</strong> the ❀candidate<br />
With regard to the selection <strong>of</strong> the ❀candidate, McCarthy’s (1998) bases<br />
his proposal on the notion <strong>of</strong> harmonic evaluation, which is central <strong>in</strong><br />
OT:<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re are three ma<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the choice <strong>of</strong> the sympathetic<br />
candidate:<br />
(1) Harmonic Evaluation<br />
<strong>The</strong> sympathetic candidate is the most harmonic member <strong>of</strong> the subset <strong>of</strong><br />
candidates available under (2) (among the candidates which obey the<br />
selector constra<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>in</strong>curs the fewest violations <strong>of</strong> Faithfulness<br />
constra<strong>in</strong>ts)<br />
(2) Conf<strong>in</strong>ement to C (+F)<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> the sympathetic candidate ℵ F is conf<strong>in</strong>ed to C (+F), the subset<br />
<strong>of</strong> candidates that obey the I-O faithfulness constra<strong>in</strong>t F.<br />
(3) Invisibility <strong>of</strong> Sympathy Constra<strong>in</strong>ts<br />
Selection <strong>of</strong> sympathetic candidates is done without reference to<br />
Sympathy Constra<strong>in</strong>ts” [McCarthy 98: 8].<br />
As far as <strong>in</strong>visibility <strong>in</strong> (3) is concerned, McCarthy claims that<br />
“…the choice <strong>of</strong> ℵ F can’t depend on performance on a constra<strong>in</strong>t that<br />
needs to know what ℵ F is <strong>in</strong> order to be evaluated. … It also restricts the<br />
descriptive power <strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>in</strong> an important way, and this helps to<br />
sharpen the differences between sympathy and standard rule-based<br />
serialism.” [McCarthy 98: 12].<br />
6.2 Status <strong>of</strong> ❀candidate and ❀constra<strong>in</strong>t<br />
<strong>The</strong> ❀candidate is almost always identical to an <strong>in</strong>termediate stage <strong>of</strong> a<br />
serial derivation. Although the ❀candidate is selected <strong>in</strong> a valid fashion<br />
and accord<strong>in</strong>g to specific conditions, the fact that another level <strong>of</strong><br />
representation is <strong>in</strong>deed needed for the correct output to be chosen, could<br />
be used <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> Serialism.<br />
<strong>The</strong> connection therefore between classic Serialism and ST is that<br />
the ❀candidate has the same status as the output <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>termediate stage<br />
rule <strong>in</strong> a serial derivation (apart from some cases <strong>of</strong> multiple-opacity,<br />
34