Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
J. MARSHALL<br />
Life mode 1.<br />
Life modes 2 & 3: Wage-workers<br />
<strong>The</strong> self-employed, farmers,<br />
fishermen, handicraft<br />
workers.<br />
2. Unskilled or semiskilled<br />
waged workers<br />
3. Salaried career<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals<br />
Figure 3.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first is that <strong>of</strong> the self-employed, where the person is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> what he<br />
terms ‘simple commodity production’. This <strong>in</strong>cludes farmers, fishermen,<br />
‘liberal trades’, handicrafts, and partnership companies (Højrup 1983: 20).<br />
<strong>The</strong> second and third form part <strong>of</strong> what he terms the ‘wage-workers’ life<br />
modes. Life mode two has to do with wage-earn<strong>in</strong>g workers <strong>in</strong> the capitalist<br />
mode <strong>of</strong> production. <strong>The</strong>se people possess neither the means <strong>of</strong> production as<br />
property, nor the qualifications to beg<strong>in</strong> and control the production process.<br />
Included <strong>in</strong> this category are unskilled and semi-skilled workers, who work<br />
only <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> the means with which to live a mean<strong>in</strong>gful life dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
their free time. <strong>The</strong> third type <strong>in</strong>cludes qualified, educated and responsible<br />
people, those who monitor and control the production process, and who attend<br />
to organisation, management and market<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong>se people are not paid hourly,<br />
but usually receive a salary for their abilities. In this career- or successoriented<br />
life mode there is less sense <strong>of</strong> solidarity with colleagues than is<br />
found with the wage earner <strong>of</strong> life mode two (I return to this notion below).<br />
<strong>The</strong> Milroys refer to Højrup’s notion <strong>of</strong> life modes as a theory<br />
which can explicitly l<strong>in</strong>k a network analysis <strong>of</strong> subgroups with<strong>in</strong> society to an<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> social structure at the political, <strong>in</strong>stitutional, and economic levels (p. 19).<br />
Højrup’s life modes theory sees subgroups as the effect <strong>of</strong> ‘fundamental<br />
societal structures which split the population <strong>in</strong>to fundamentally different life<br />
modes’ (Højrup 1983: 47). <strong>The</strong> Milroys suggest that the different types <strong>of</strong><br />
network structure seem to arise from the differences <strong>in</strong> life mode <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals. Højrup’s concept <strong>of</strong> life mode, like that <strong>of</strong> network, is a structural<br />
one, and the characteristics <strong>of</strong> one life mode are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its contrast to<br />
136