19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EMERGENCE OF TENSE AND AGREEMENT<br />

assert that agreement is established. Though we cannot rule out that type <strong>of</strong><br />

performance. <strong>The</strong> two children rarely used 1 st s<strong>in</strong>gular <strong>in</strong>appropriately,<br />

however, they substituted the 3 rd mascul<strong>in</strong>e form which is unmarked for<br />

other suffixes. Due to the record<strong>in</strong>g sett<strong>in</strong>g, it is unexpected that children<br />

would use the 2 nd mascul<strong>in</strong>e, however Sara and Osama implemented the<br />

suffix. It is important to emphasize that both children used that <strong>in</strong>flection<br />

<strong>in</strong> the formula s#if-t “did you (m) see?” which raises the question whether<br />

this form is lexicalised rather than productive.<br />

Besides substitution errors discussed above, the children also erred <strong>in</strong><br />

other categories as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Table 7. <strong>The</strong> Table shows stem errors<br />

when the imperfective stem is used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> perfective one or vice versa,<br />

transitivity errors when a transitive verb (Class II) is used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>trasitive (Class V), mood errors when the imperative is used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong><br />

declarative, causative errors when a verb is used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the causative<br />

form <strong>of</strong> it and voice errors when the active voice is used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the<br />

passive. Look<strong>in</strong>g at the table below, it is clear that stem errors are very rare<br />

which <strong>in</strong>dicates that children use correctly the <strong>in</strong>ternal vowel quality that is<br />

considered as mark<strong>in</strong>g aspect (for more detail look at section 2) quite early.<br />

For example: <strong>in</strong> sample 7 Sara said after clos<strong>in</strong>g the watch $araf ‘know’<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> a-$arif ‘I know’. In that example not only did she not mark the<br />

verb with the 1 st s<strong>in</strong>gular present tense <strong>in</strong>flection as required but also she<br />

used the wrong stem. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce this is the only case <strong>of</strong> stem error it<br />

could be a performance error.<br />

Table 7 Other types <strong>of</strong> error <strong>in</strong> the two children’s production<br />

Type Sara Osama<br />

Stem 2 1<br />

Transitivity 11 10<br />

Mood 1 1<br />

Causative 2<br />

Voice 3<br />

Total 17 14<br />

Children display similarities <strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>g the same transitive verb error on<br />

one verb sabba! ‘give someone a bath’ while the child should say<br />

tesabba! ‘took a bath’. Most importantly, sabba!, or sometimes babba!,<br />

are adult forms to babies and very young children, where they mean ‘take a<br />

bath’. This suggests that adults are us<strong>in</strong>g the least marked form to children<br />

and <strong>in</strong> their part children pick up on that form and use it frequently.<br />

Further, Sara and Osama used, twice each, other type <strong>of</strong> verb <strong>in</strong>correctly<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!