Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
J. MARSHALL<br />
4 Do you work/go to school with at least two other locals <strong>of</strong> the same sex?<br />
5 Do you spend time with work/school friends after work/school, or dur<strong>in</strong>g weekends<br />
and holidays?<br />
6 Do you take part <strong>in</strong> a local group (organised or non organised) <strong>in</strong> the area? (religion,<br />
scouts, guides, youth groups, D<strong>of</strong>E, sports, jobs, holiday activities, hunt<strong>in</strong>g, cards,<br />
bridge).<br />
7 Do you take part <strong>in</strong> leisure or sports activities with 2 or more locals or work/school<br />
friends?<br />
8 have your mother and father lived here all their lives?<br />
<strong>The</strong> Doric SOCNET score is a network <strong>in</strong>dex score, or a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>teractional and structural criteria (mostly the former), which has been used<br />
to test whether a high social network score will predict a high (conservative)<br />
dialect <strong>in</strong>dex score. <strong>The</strong> range is zero (m<strong>in</strong>imal network density and<br />
multiplexity) to eight (maximal). <strong>The</strong> Doric <strong>in</strong>dex has limitations for<br />
structural criteria, such as the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
1) Size<br />
2) Density<br />
3) Centrality<br />
4) Cluster<strong>in</strong>g<br />
5) Network role <strong>of</strong> the speaker<br />
It does, however, accurately measure the <strong>in</strong>teractional criteria <strong>of</strong> the network,<br />
and as such is similar to Milroy’s network strength <strong>in</strong>dex:<br />
1) Number & frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>teractions<br />
2) Multiplexity<br />
3) Strength<br />
4) Content<br />
<strong>The</strong> questionnaire was based closely on Milroy’s and Pedersen’s<br />
questionnaires, and this makes the scores obta<strong>in</strong>ed comparable to theirs. A<br />
more complex and structurally oriented measure could not have been achieved<br />
without spend<strong>in</strong>g an extremely lengthy period <strong>of</strong> time <strong>in</strong> the fieldwork area,<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g among, and <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g with local people.<br />
152