19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. MARSHALL<br />

6. Research Question and Hypothesis<br />

<strong>The</strong> research question is as follows:<br />

<strong>The</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic conservatism <strong>of</strong> the Huntly area has been due to many reasons, such<br />

as historico-political and geographical factors, and national pride. Now that these<br />

are becom<strong>in</strong>g less <strong>in</strong>fluential, and change is accelerat<strong>in</strong>g, which social factors are<br />

primarily <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> language change and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance?<br />

<strong>The</strong> hypothesis is:<br />

Young female speakers will lead l<strong>in</strong>guistic change. People with dense, multiplex<br />

social networks, and low degrees <strong>of</strong> mental urbanisation will lag.<br />

6.1 <strong>The</strong> Research Design<br />

<strong>The</strong> relatively rapid language change currently <strong>in</strong> progress <strong>in</strong> the Huntly<br />

farm<strong>in</strong>g community makes it ideal for a study <strong>of</strong> language change.<br />

Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic theories have been developed to account for language change<br />

and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, many <strong>in</strong> urban speech communities. Pedersen’s (1991) and<br />

Lippi-Green’s (1989) studies <strong>of</strong> rural communities have not yielded the same<br />

results as, for example, Milroy’s (1980) study <strong>of</strong> Belfast speech. <strong>The</strong> Doric<br />

study was conceived as a test <strong>of</strong> the various social factors <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />

language change and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. <strong>The</strong> question is, is an <strong>in</strong>dividual’s degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to social networks a reliable predictor <strong>of</strong> language<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>tenance, especially <strong>in</strong> rural speech communities? Are attitudes to the<br />

local variety reliable? Is national pride, especially <strong>in</strong> a country like Scotland,<br />

an important factor <strong>in</strong> this question? Does Pedersen’s adapted form <strong>of</strong><br />

Højrup’s (1983) concept <strong>of</strong> Life Modes, where she focuses more on the<br />

mental urbanisation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividual, throw more light on the problem <strong>of</strong><br />

account<strong>in</strong>g for resistance to change?<br />

6.2. Sampl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>The</strong> Doric spoken <strong>in</strong> the valley between the towns <strong>of</strong> Insch and Huntly <strong>in</strong> the<br />

county <strong>of</strong> Aberdeenshire <strong>in</strong> Scotland has been focused on, <strong>in</strong> an attempt to<br />

answer the research question. This is <strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>of</strong> what Hendry (1997)<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!