19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

R. INGHAM<br />

representations but also <strong>in</strong>volve establish<strong>in</strong>g some form <strong>of</strong> rule-governed<br />

knowledge. <strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the present paper show that children whose rulebased<br />

language system is develop<strong>in</strong>g normally do not have a deficit <strong>in</strong> this<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>, whereas those whose rule system-form<strong>in</strong>g ability is impaired (on a<br />

production measure <strong>of</strong> past tense form) also have a deficit with argument<br />

structure (on a production measure <strong>of</strong> verb-specific syntactic forms). This<br />

alignment <strong>of</strong> an a-structure deficit with a past tense deficit may suggest that<br />

grammatical SLI <strong>in</strong>volves the representation or process<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> structural<br />

relations at the clause level, thus go<strong>in</strong>g beyond morphological featurebl<strong>in</strong>dness<br />

(Gopnik & Crago 1991), extended optional <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itive (Rice, Wexler<br />

& Cleave 1995) or impaired paradigm build<strong>in</strong>g (Leonard 1998), and<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g a structural relations account such as that <strong>of</strong> van der Lely &<br />

Stollwerck (1997).<br />

However, despite this slight widen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> grammar acquisition to<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude argument structure, my tentative conclusion is that these grammar<br />

impairments are fundamentally dissociated from lexical acquisition, contra<br />

the position taken by Bates & Goodman (1997) and others. It appears to occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> some SLI children with no receptive lexical deficit, while <strong>in</strong> others<br />

grammar acquisition seems robust enough to proceed despite a pronounced<br />

receptive lexical deficit. <strong>The</strong> research presented here <strong>in</strong> prelim<strong>in</strong>ary form<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicates that models <strong>of</strong> acquisition which provide for a dissociation between<br />

acquisition mechanisms will be more successful <strong>in</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g for these<br />

results than models which provide a s<strong>in</strong>gle mechanism driv<strong>in</strong>g both grammar<br />

acquisition and lexical acquisition.<br />

References<br />

Bates, E. & J. Goodman (1997) On the <strong>in</strong>separability <strong>of</strong> grammar and the lexicon.<br />

Language and cognitive processes 12, 507-584.<br />

Bates, E., I. Bretherton, & L. Snyder (1988) From first words to grammar: <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

differences and dissociable mechanisms. CUP.<br />

Bishop, D. (1992) <strong>The</strong> underly<strong>in</strong>g nature <strong>of</strong> specific language impairment. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Child Psychology and Psychiatry 28, 1-8.<br />

Bishop, D. & Edmondson (1987) Language impaired 4 year-olds: dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g transient<br />

from persistent impairment. Journal <strong>of</strong> Speech and Hear<strong>in</strong>g Disorders 52, 156-173.<br />

Clahsen , H., M. Rothweiler, A. Woest, & G. Marcus (1993) Regular and irregular<br />

<strong>in</strong>flection <strong>in</strong> the acquisition <strong>of</strong> German noun plurals. Cognition 45 225-255.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!