Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
K ALJENAIE<br />
test<strong>in</strong>g ground. To what extent are UG pr<strong>in</strong>ciples available to an Arabicspeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
child from the early language production? And what<br />
developmental patterns characterise the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Arabic?<br />
<strong>The</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> western languages has been <strong>in</strong>tensively studied. <strong>The</strong><br />
acquisition <strong>of</strong> Arabic has received a very little attention. <strong>The</strong>re are two<br />
studies that could be mentioned here: Omar (1973) studied the acquisition<br />
<strong>of</strong> Egyptian Arabic <strong>of</strong> 37 children (rang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> age from 6 months to 15<br />
years) which ma<strong>in</strong>ly focussed on the nom<strong>in</strong>al and adjectival morphology<br />
besides syntax and phonology. One <strong>of</strong> the major f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs related to this<br />
paper is the fact that Egyptian children enter the multiword stage between<br />
2;6-3;0. Second, morphology emerges at the age <strong>of</strong> 2;6. <strong>The</strong> second study<br />
was conducted by Abdu & Abdu (1986) on the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian<br />
Arabic <strong>of</strong> their two children. <strong>The</strong> data reveals early appearance <strong>of</strong><br />
grammatical <strong>in</strong>flections before the age <strong>of</strong> 2;0 as well as <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> the developmental order and the time <strong>of</strong> appearance.<br />
Unfortunately, the previous studies lack quantitative measures <strong>of</strong><br />
frequency and productivity.<br />
2. <strong>The</strong> Arabic language and Kuwaiti Arabic (KA)<br />
<strong>The</strong> Arabic language, which belongs to the Semitic group <strong>of</strong> languages is<br />
classified as Classical Arabic (CA), Modern standard Arabic (MSA) or<br />
Modern Literary Arabic, and Colloquial Arabic. Classical Arabic is the<br />
language <strong>of</strong> the Quraan (the Holy book <strong>of</strong> Muslims). MSA is a written<br />
form <strong>of</strong> the language and it is used <strong>in</strong> the media (radio, newspaper, and<br />
television), education, legal and formal texts. <strong>The</strong> grammar or morphology<br />
<strong>of</strong> Classical Arabic still applies sufficiently to MSA. However, MSA<br />
differs from Classical Arabic ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> vocabulary and stylistic features<br />
(Fischer 1997). <strong>The</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> the mass media has led to the popularity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the MSA (Bulos 1965). Colloquial Arabic dialects are used primarily for<br />
ord<strong>in</strong>ary oral communication and each country <strong>in</strong> the Arab world is<br />
characterized by its own dialect (Beeston 1970; Bulos 1965; Fischer 1997).<br />
Arabic is a synthetic language and the <strong>in</strong>flectional markers are realized<br />
<strong>in</strong> suffixes, prefixes and <strong>in</strong>fixes as well. Often two or three <strong>of</strong> these<br />
markers comb<strong>in</strong>ed together. For example: prefixes ma-ktab ‘<strong>of</strong>fice’,<br />
<strong>in</strong>fixes <strong>in</strong>-t-aqala ‘transferred or moved’ and suffixes !ammr-a ‘red-F’<br />
(Owens 1997). <strong>The</strong> characteristic feature <strong>of</strong> Semitic languages is their<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> consonantal roots (CCC), which mostly consist <strong>of</strong> three<br />
consonants (triliteral) (Beeston 1970). <strong>The</strong> triliteral root is the most<br />
common type <strong>in</strong> the language (Erw<strong>in</strong> 1963). <strong>The</strong>re are some<br />
2