19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

K ALJENAIE<br />

test<strong>in</strong>g ground. To what extent are UG pr<strong>in</strong>ciples available to an Arabicspeak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

child from the early language production? And what<br />

developmental patterns characterise the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Arabic?<br />

<strong>The</strong> acquisition <strong>of</strong> western languages has been <strong>in</strong>tensively studied. <strong>The</strong><br />

acquisition <strong>of</strong> Arabic has received a very little attention. <strong>The</strong>re are two<br />

studies that could be mentioned here: Omar (1973) studied the acquisition<br />

<strong>of</strong> Egyptian Arabic <strong>of</strong> 37 children (rang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> age from 6 months to 15<br />

years) which ma<strong>in</strong>ly focussed on the nom<strong>in</strong>al and adjectival morphology<br />

besides syntax and phonology. One <strong>of</strong> the major f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs related to this<br />

paper is the fact that Egyptian children enter the multiword stage between<br />

2;6-3;0. Second, morphology emerges at the age <strong>of</strong> 2;6. <strong>The</strong> second study<br />

was conducted by Abdu & Abdu (1986) on the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Palest<strong>in</strong>ian<br />

Arabic <strong>of</strong> their two children. <strong>The</strong> data reveals early appearance <strong>of</strong><br />

grammatical <strong>in</strong>flections before the age <strong>of</strong> 2;0 as well as <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

differences <strong>in</strong> the developmental order and the time <strong>of</strong> appearance.<br />

Unfortunately, the previous studies lack quantitative measures <strong>of</strong><br />

frequency and productivity.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> Arabic language and Kuwaiti Arabic (KA)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Arabic language, which belongs to the Semitic group <strong>of</strong> languages is<br />

classified as Classical Arabic (CA), Modern standard Arabic (MSA) or<br />

Modern Literary Arabic, and Colloquial Arabic. Classical Arabic is the<br />

language <strong>of</strong> the Quraan (the Holy book <strong>of</strong> Muslims). MSA is a written<br />

form <strong>of</strong> the language and it is used <strong>in</strong> the media (radio, newspaper, and<br />

television), education, legal and formal texts. <strong>The</strong> grammar or morphology<br />

<strong>of</strong> Classical Arabic still applies sufficiently to MSA. However, MSA<br />

differs from Classical Arabic ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> vocabulary and stylistic features<br />

(Fischer 1997). <strong>The</strong> expansion <strong>of</strong> the mass media has led to the popularity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the MSA (Bulos 1965). Colloquial Arabic dialects are used primarily for<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary oral communication and each country <strong>in</strong> the Arab world is<br />

characterized by its own dialect (Beeston 1970; Bulos 1965; Fischer 1997).<br />

Arabic is a synthetic language and the <strong>in</strong>flectional markers are realized<br />

<strong>in</strong> suffixes, prefixes and <strong>in</strong>fixes as well. Often two or three <strong>of</strong> these<br />

markers comb<strong>in</strong>ed together. For example: prefixes ma-ktab ‘<strong>of</strong>fice’,<br />

<strong>in</strong>fixes <strong>in</strong>-t-aqala ‘transferred or moved’ and suffixes !ammr-a ‘red-F’<br />

(Owens 1997). <strong>The</strong> characteristic feature <strong>of</strong> Semitic languages is their<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> consonantal roots (CCC), which mostly consist <strong>of</strong> three<br />

consonants (triliteral) (Beeston 1970). <strong>The</strong> triliteral root is the most<br />

common type <strong>in</strong> the language (Erw<strong>in</strong> 1963). <strong>The</strong>re are some<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!