19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMERGENCE OF TENSE AND AGREEMENT<br />

quadriconsonantal roots and also a limited number <strong>of</strong> biconsonantal roots.<br />

A variation <strong>in</strong> shade <strong>of</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g is obta<strong>in</strong>ed first by vary<strong>in</strong>g the vowel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> the simple root, and secondly by the addition <strong>of</strong> the prefixes, suffixes,<br />

and <strong>in</strong>fixes. By the comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the root + vowel pattern a stem is<br />

atta<strong>in</strong>ed which make up word classes (Bakall 1979; Erw<strong>in</strong> 1963; Jensen<br />

1990; Lyov<strong>in</strong> 1997; Mitchelle 1962; Owens 1997). Various words with the<br />

same root share same mean<strong>in</strong>g through their association with that root<br />

(Bakalla 1979). For example, daras ‘he studied’, madrasa ‘school’,<br />

modarris ‘male teacher’ etc, are related to the triliteral root drs which<br />

means ‘study<strong>in</strong>g’.<br />

Erw<strong>in</strong> (1963) categorizes triliteral roots <strong>in</strong>to two types. <strong>The</strong> first type<br />

is the strong root (CCC; C stands for a consonant) which <strong>in</strong>cludes sound<br />

roots (second and third radical are not identical), e.g. ktb ‘write’ and<br />

double roots (second and third radical are identical such as skk ‘close’).<br />

<strong>The</strong> second type is the weak root where one or more radical element is<br />

unstable with either ", w or y or it may be represented by vowel length.<br />

Examples <strong>of</strong> the second type are "kl ‘eat’, rwV ‘show’ and yVV ‘come’<br />

(the V stands for the weak radical). It is important to emphasize that the<br />

root and pattern are “theoretical abstractions” and not pronounceable <strong>in</strong><br />

their own realization (Beeston 1970; Jensen 1990).<br />

2.1 <strong>The</strong> Verb<br />

Arabic has its own system <strong>of</strong> derived stems <strong>in</strong>to which triliteral verbs fall<br />

<strong>in</strong>to and most Arabic dialects ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. MECAS (1965:110) describes<br />

the verb derivation: “the system <strong>of</strong> derived or <strong>in</strong>creased forms is one by<br />

which modification to the First Form <strong>of</strong> a verb are accompanied by<br />

modification <strong>in</strong> the mean<strong>in</strong>g”. With<strong>in</strong> that system there are 10 derivational<br />

Classes (Template or Forms) (Erw<strong>in</strong> 1963; Kaye & Rosenhouse 1997;<br />

MECAS 1965). For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper, the ma<strong>in</strong> focus is on three<br />

Classes only.<br />

1. Class 1: Mostly simple verbs belong to this Class like taa! ‘fall’. Both<br />

transitive and <strong>in</strong>transitive verbs belong to this Class which has no<br />

particular mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2. Class II: is the class to make transitive verbs from other forms and the<br />

most frequent mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the verbs <strong>in</strong> this Class is causative. Verbs <strong>in</strong><br />

this Class are characterized by a double middle radical. <strong>The</strong> conjugation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Class I verb taa! ‘fell’ is tayya! ‘fell/drop’ <strong>in</strong>transitive causative<br />

verb s<strong>in</strong>ce verb taa! ‘fell’ is a weak middle root tV!, the y <strong>in</strong> the<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!