19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMERGENCE OF TENSE AND AGREEMENT<br />

5. Verb Types<br />

In the previous paragraphs the focus has been ma<strong>in</strong>ly on the developmental<br />

order <strong>of</strong> the grammatical <strong>in</strong>flections <strong>in</strong> both tenses. It is important to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e the root types <strong>in</strong> the four children’s production s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />

characteristic feature <strong>of</strong> Arabic is its basis <strong>of</strong> consonantal root (cf. section<br />

2). Table 14 illustrates the types <strong>of</strong> root structure produced by the two<br />

children dur<strong>in</strong>g the period <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong> both present and past tense<br />

which are separated due to the fact that each tense has its own stem form.<br />

Table 14 Types <strong>of</strong> root <strong>in</strong> the four children’s production<br />

Root Type<br />

Sara<br />

Osama<br />

Present Past Present Past<br />

CCC 18 16 13 9<br />

CVC 9 9 8 4<br />

CCV 5 2 5 2<br />

CVV 1<br />

Total 33 27 26 15<br />

Look<strong>in</strong>g at the table above, it is obvious that there is not a significant<br />

difference between the total number <strong>of</strong> root types <strong>in</strong> both tenses <strong>in</strong> Sara’s<br />

data <strong>in</strong> contrast to Osama. He used 26 verb types <strong>in</strong> the present form and<br />

only 15 <strong>in</strong> the past. This suggests that the children implemented the<br />

present tense <strong>in</strong>flections more than the past tense suffixes as discussed<br />

before (cf. section 4.1). <strong>The</strong> CCC root structure appeared more frequently<br />

<strong>in</strong> the present tense than <strong>in</strong> the past, CVC came second and the least<br />

frequent is the CCV. Sara used one type <strong>of</strong> CVV structure <strong>in</strong> the verb yaa<br />

‘come’.<br />

Compar<strong>in</strong>g the total number <strong>of</strong> root types and total number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>flected<br />

verbs as shown <strong>in</strong> Table 14 above, (type/number present: 33/199, and<br />

26/137; and past: 27/163 and 15/76). One might <strong>in</strong>terpret the low ratio as<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g that children’s use <strong>of</strong> the grammatical <strong>in</strong>flection was highly<br />

productive (that is each verb was <strong>in</strong>flected with more than one <strong>in</strong>flection).<br />

However, based on further exam<strong>in</strong>ation on the number <strong>of</strong> root types that<br />

were <strong>in</strong>flected with one <strong>in</strong>flection and those <strong>in</strong>flected with more as<br />

summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 15, one can reach a different conclusion.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!