19.05.2014 Views

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2000) - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EMERGENCE OF TENSE AND AGREEMENT<br />

different forms due to phonological considerations. In general there is no<br />

gender dist<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>in</strong> the 1 st person <strong>in</strong>flection <strong>in</strong> the language.<br />

Table 1 Present / Imperfect <strong>in</strong>flections <strong>in</strong> KA a<br />

Verb root<br />

Person Number Gender Morpheme<br />

Gloss<br />

(l-b-s)<br />

SG - (!) a- albis I wear<br />

1<br />

PL n(a)- nalbis We wear<br />

SG M t(a)- talbis You (m) wear<br />

SG F t(a)- i<strong>in</strong> talbisi<strong>in</strong> You (f) wear<br />

2<br />

PL - t(a)- oon talbisoon You wear<br />

SG M y(a)-/i- yalbis He wears<br />

SG F t(a)- talbis She wears<br />

3<br />

PL - y(a)- oon yalbisoon <strong>The</strong>y wear<br />

a SG= s<strong>in</strong>gular, PL= plural, M=mascul<strong>in</strong>e, F=fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, -= common.<br />

Table 1 characterizes 3 features about the present tense <strong>in</strong>flections.<br />

Firstly, the 2 nd mascul<strong>in</strong>e and the 3 rd fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e prefixes are homonymous,<br />

therefore, either overt subject or context is essential <strong>in</strong> comprehension.<br />

Secondly, the prefix vowel varies accord<strong>in</strong>g to the stem as <strong>in</strong> ye-roo! ‘he<br />

goes’ and ya-lbis ‘he wears’. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the glottal stop prefix for " is not<br />

widely used <strong>in</strong> KA. <strong>The</strong> classical suffix -n <strong>in</strong> the present tense is preserved<br />

<strong>in</strong> KA and other countries <strong>in</strong> the area (Iraq, and the Arabian Pen<strong>in</strong>sula)<br />

while other Arab countries just disregard it (Motar 1969). As for the 3 rd<br />

mascul<strong>in</strong>e prefix, it has two forms either y-or e- and they are not <strong>in</strong><br />

complementary distribution. To illustrate, it is appropriate to say ye-roo!<br />

and i-roo! ‘he goes’; however <strong>in</strong> the root structure lbs the appropriate<br />

form is ya-lbis ‘he wears’ but not *i-lbis. It seems that Kuwaiti speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

Arabic do not allow the latter form to avoid confusion with the mascul<strong>in</strong>e<br />

imperative form which requires prefix vowel <strong>in</strong> the CCC root structure.<br />

Table 2 that follows demonstrates the past tense paradigm <strong>in</strong> Kuwaiti<br />

Arabic. Look<strong>in</strong>g at the table, it is clear that all past tense <strong>in</strong>flections are<br />

suffixes. <strong>The</strong> 1 st person s<strong>in</strong>gular and 2 nd mascul<strong>in</strong>e are homonymous<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>gly overt subject and context are important <strong>in</strong> comprehension. <strong>The</strong><br />

third po<strong>in</strong>t that needs to be mentioned is the fact that 3 rd person mascul<strong>in</strong>e<br />

has no specific grammatical <strong>in</strong>flection <strong>in</strong> the dialect while <strong>in</strong> CA and MSA<br />

the <strong>in</strong>flection has the suffix form /-a/. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the 3 rd mascul<strong>in</strong>e verb<br />

form is unmarked form and it is homophonous with its own stem. In the 3 rd<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!