22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. GOOD GUYS AND BAD GUYS COMPETE THE SAME WAY<br />

It appears that prison does not have an effect on the global result.<br />

The incapacitating periods appear compensated by increased activity<br />

once the bird is out of the cage. This hard will to comply with the<br />

program and the schedule makes the criminal forecastable. His past<br />

activity contains the information to map the future one, in the same<br />

sense a segment of the trajectory of a bullet can be used to calculate<br />

the previous part and the following part.<br />

Marchetti then proceeds to suggest that limited prison sentences for<br />

theft and minor crimes should be abolished. Confinement is ineffective<br />

in protecting society because offenders usually “catch up” with accelerated<br />

criminality as soon as they are out of prison. He also thinks that<br />

detaining people in prisons as corrective action is too expensive and<br />

consequently an inefficient way of spending taxpayers’ money. A better<br />

use of the money would be to compensate the victims, thus treating<br />

crime as something like other social misfortunes.<br />

At my first opportunity I argued with Marchetti on this issue. My<br />

understanding of competitive growth tells me that natural processes reflect<br />

an equilibrium between opposing forces, and that a criminal career<br />

would “aim” at a higher plateau had there been no deterrents whatsoever.<br />

<strong>Fe</strong>ar of a jail sentence certainly helps suppress the expression of<br />

criminal impulses. Marchetti agreed with me, but he had an answer<br />

ready: “Why not something like old-fashioned thrashings?” he suggested.<br />

“They could serve as a deterrent, and they cost far less than<br />

prison sentences.”<br />

Endless criticisms would certainly be sparked by such arguments.<br />

Yet there is a moral to this story, and it should be acceptable to most<br />

people. The matching of S-curves to criminal careers—and the ensuing<br />

forecasts—can only be done after a sizable portion of one’s criminality<br />

has already been realized. From the point of view of a natural growth<br />

process, this time is too late for effective corrective action. The continued<br />

growth of a tree that has already reached a fair fraction of its final<br />

height is more or less secured. Measures to really combat criminality<br />

effectively should be taken before a person establishes him or herself as<br />

a criminal.<br />

“Programmed” criminality is not restricted to individuals. In the<br />

case of creativity and innovation we have seen similarities between<br />

individual and aggregate cases (companies and nations). A company<br />

<strong>10</strong>9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!