22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

11. FORECASTING DESTINY<br />

in general. The stories regarding both the pros and cons of nuclear energy<br />

simply reflect the attention paid to the subject. The graphs concern<br />

the United States, a country that claims the largest number both of reactors<br />

in operation and years of experience; at the same time it is a country<br />

in which the press is particularly dynamic and influential. The cumulative<br />

accidents data are for nuclear plants built during the first wave of<br />

construction (circa 1974). The sites in the second wave have not been in<br />

operation long enough to produce major accidents. The press coverage<br />

is quantified in terms of an index representing the percentage of periodicals’<br />

space devoted to information relating to nuclear plants. 5 The<br />

cumulative index is plotted in the figure. The curves fitted on the data<br />

provide a fair description for both accidents data and the coverage index,<br />

indicating that we are indeed dealing with phenomena that have a<br />

well-defined beginning and an end, all relating to the first wave of reactor<br />

construction.<br />

The press coverage curve is parallel to, but comes two years before,<br />

the accidents curve. Opinion intensity seems to have preceded accident<br />

probability by a couple of years. This may not prove that it was the<br />

press coverage which caused the accidents (chronological succession<br />

does not necessarily mean causality), but it disproves the opposite: that<br />

it was the wave of accidents which stimulated the press coverage.<br />

It could be that a kind of cultural epidemic renders nuclear reactor<br />

operators more accident-prone. David P. Phillips has provided evidence<br />

in support of what he calls the “Echo Effect,” claiming that following<br />

the publication of news of the suicide or homicide of a popular personality,<br />

car accidents—single cars in particular—increase significantly<br />

with respect to the usual average. They show a large peak three days<br />

after the report and a smaller one eight days later. Similarly, there is a<br />

three-day strong echo effect (and a weaker seven-day one) in airplane<br />

accidents—many of them corporate planes (Appendix C, Figure 11.1).<br />

Most of these accidents are suicides in disguise.<br />

There are some interesting coincidences concerning nuclear plant<br />

accidents. 6 The film The China Syndrome describes events similar to<br />

those that occurred during the Three-Mile-Island accident; it was released<br />

just a few weeks earlier. The accident itself occurred at the peak<br />

of the twelve-year long press-coverage curve (the middle of the S-<br />

curve). This accident, which appeared as the worst ever in the United<br />

257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!