22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. FORECASTING DESTINY<br />

The “naturalness” of a process can thus be evidenced in two ways:<br />

by an unambiguous S-shaped pattern of growth, but also by persisting<br />

oscillations around a constant level. In fact, the latter is a partial manifestation<br />

of the former, since it is what happens at the beginning and at<br />

the end of the natural-growth S-curve. One way or another, at any given<br />

moment of the process, there is a clear indication about what projections<br />

into the future can be made.<br />

All along the trajectory one can find superimposed fluctuations resembling<br />

chaotic phenomena, themselves claiming a right to<br />

naturalness. One could debate endlessly about which one is more natural,<br />

the S-shaped growth pattern or the random fluctuations. But from a<br />

practical point of view it must be pointed out that chaos studies have not<br />

demonstrated improvements in forecasts. Then, too, deviations from the<br />

natural-growth pattern may result from wars, governmental actions, and<br />

fads. But such deviations can be characterized as unnatural; they are<br />

relatively short-lived, and the growth process soon regains its previous<br />

course. It might be revealing to examine some cases of these unnatural<br />

deviations, the individuals who are responsible for them, and the consequences<br />

of their actions. 1<br />

DECISION NON-MAKERS<br />

A country’s government is a typical decision-making body which sets<br />

courses of action for an entire nation. Enforcement of a new policy may<br />

seem desirable and feasible in the minds of the country’s leaders, but<br />

when policy decisions are made with no respect for the natural processes<br />

already established, the results can be negative and provoke<br />

embarrassment if not violent opposition. I will give two such examples,<br />

both of them concerning the important subject of planning for primary<br />

energy sources. 2<br />

The first example takes us to the United Kingdom, one of the<br />

world’s major coal producers. In the substitution between primary energy<br />

sources presented in Chapter Seven, we saw that the relative<br />

importance of coal has been declining in favor of oil (and to a lesser<br />

extent natural gas) since early in this century. This substitution is natural<br />

250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!