22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. GOOD GUYS AND BAD GUYS COMPETE THE SAME WAY<br />

Unknown to them, the men at the meeting had all the elements necessary<br />

to make a fairly accurate prediction about one of the diseases that<br />

concerned them, diphtheria, but emotions and traditional thinking<br />

blocked a more revealing look into the future. The declining jagged line<br />

in Figure 5.3 shows the percentage of all deaths attributed to diphtheria<br />

in the United States. The data come from the Statistical Abstract of the<br />

United States. 4<br />

The years centered around World War I show a wavy structure. The<br />

nine-year average is designated with a big dot and falls right on the S-<br />

curve fitted to the data points. During the early war years diphtheria<br />

claims a particularly low share, while in the years immediately after the<br />

war its role becomes excessively important. The situation offers itself to<br />

a variety of explanations. Heavy loss of life in combat during the war<br />

could result in a reduced share of deaths for the disease. The peak<br />

claimed by diphtheria right after the war could be attributed to warrelated<br />

consequences, such as large numbers of wounded and insufficient<br />

supplies and medical care, conditions that may have favored<br />

diphtheria more than other diseases for some reason. However, the fact<br />

that peak and valley compensate each other rather precisely is evidence<br />

for an underlying stability and supports the argument that a concerned<br />

population shows resistance to diseases while in danger (that is, World<br />

War I) but becomes vulnerable when the danger subsides.<br />

The fit in Figure 5.3 is based only on the data before 1933. The dotted<br />

line extended beyond 1933 is the extrapolation of the mathematical<br />

function determined from the historical window 1900–1933. I truncated<br />

history in 1933 because the antidiphtheric vaccine was officially introduced<br />

on a large scale that year. In a country like the United States, with<br />

excellent means of communication and an efficient medical system, one<br />

would expect that once a vaccine becomes available for a bacterial disease,<br />

there will be no more victims.<br />

Surprisingly, the historical data after 1933 coincide with the extrapolation<br />

of the fitted curve determined from the data before 1933. It<br />

means the disease continued to decline according to a “prescription”<br />

established before the vaccine. If anything, the data points seem to<br />

fluctuate less in more recent years, making the agreement between the<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!