22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. COMPETITION IS THE CREATOR AND THE REGULATOR<br />

for his estimate, but if I were to use the energy-substitution picture and<br />

the fact that world energy consumption has been growing at a steady<br />

average of 2 percent annually since 1860, I would find a 220 percent<br />

increase in natural gas consumption by 20<strong>10</strong>. In the United States<br />

alone, the increase would certainly be bigger because energy consumption<br />

here has been growing at least 3 percent annually. Doing the<br />

analysis quantitatively for the United States the model projected that<br />

for the year 2000 natural gas consumption should be four times that<br />

of year 1982.<br />

Ten <strong>Years</strong> <strong>Later</strong><br />

That turned out to be a most inaccurate forecast! The small<br />

circles in Figure 7.6 show important deviations from the projected<br />

trends for the shares of coal and natural gas. While the<br />

trajectories for oil and nuclear energy consumption turned out<br />

as predicted, the evolution of natural gas fell way below what<br />

had been expected, and the share of coal remained high deviating<br />

progressively more and more from the predicted course.<br />

How can these energy sources behave like species in natural<br />

competition for almost one hundred years, and then suddenly<br />

fall in disarray?<br />

Cesare Marchetti argues that the deviation is due to legislative<br />

intervention by some governments (for example, U.K.<br />

and Germany) to keep coal production levels high. Such interventions<br />

can be considered “unnatural” and should be corrected<br />

sooner or later. According to this thinking, pressure<br />

must be building up for corrective action, which could take the<br />

form of miners’ strike, social unrest, or other political intervention.<br />

But there is another problem. The extraordinary<br />

gains of coal depress the market share of natural gas instead<br />

of that of oil. In the substitution model there can be no interaction<br />

between phasing-in and phasing-out competitors;<br />

everyone competes against the frontrunner, in this case oil,<br />

and yet in Figure 7.6 natural gas, a phasing-in competitor,<br />

loses market share to coal, a phasing-out competitor. Oil, the<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!