22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. A HARD FACT OF LIFE<br />

Another innovation vehemently opposed is the fluoridation of drinking<br />

water to prevent tooth decay. Historian Donald R. McNeil has<br />

summed up the situation in an article titled “America’s Longest War:<br />

The Fight over Fluoridation, 1950-19??” 5 He points out that after forty<br />

years, half of the American population does not have fluoridated water.<br />

The opposition was varied and surprising. Even the church was mobilized<br />

against fluoridation. Among the arguments used by opponents has<br />

been that it increases communism, atheism, and mongolism! Water supplies<br />

in the United States are routinely chlorinated today, but that idea<br />

was also fiercely opposed when first proposed.<br />

Opposition to technological innovations reached violent and criminal<br />

levels in England in 1830 when farming machines were introduced. The<br />

increased productivity of threshing machines jeopardized the jobs of<br />

farm laborers, who reacted by trying to stop the diffusion of the innovation<br />

and tried to win public opinion and the sympathy of the Church.<br />

Opposition first manifested itself sporadically by destroying farming<br />

equipment, setting farms ablaze, sabotaging firefighting efforts,and receiving<br />

light sentences for such crimes. But troubles culminated in<br />

November 1830 with a wave of concentrated attacks on threshing machines.<br />

E. J. Hobsbawm and G. Rude have collected detailed data on the<br />

destruction of 250 machines in a period of one month. 6 This violent expression<br />

of discontent displayed the hallmark of a “natural” evolution:<br />

The cumulative number of machines destroyed traces a complete S-<br />

curve in one month (Appendix C, Figure 6.4). Similar pictures would<br />

probably describe other means of resistance that also slowed the diffusion<br />

of this innovation.<br />

The introduction of farming machines capable of increasing productivity<br />

is typical of a new technology disturbing an equilibrium<br />

established around an old technology. The part of the population whose<br />

income is threatened will fight against it for a while, retarding the rate of<br />

diffusion. But sociocultural resistance to change was not always manifested<br />

by violent opposition and criticism. Sometimes its only<br />

manifestation was the introduction of extended delays in what should<br />

normally be rapidly accepted. Innovations of indisputable benefit requiring<br />

no capital investment or economic hardship have taken up to<br />

fifty years to gain popularity in society. One example is the general<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!