22.06.2014 Views

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

PREDICTIONS – 10 Years Later - Santa Fe Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. INANIMATE PRODUCTION LIKE ANIMATE REPRODUCTION<br />

In gathering the data concerning the construction of cathedrals, I had<br />

to distinguish Gothic cathedrals from large churches. I also had to estimate<br />

a cornerstone date for old churches that were “upgraded” to<br />

cathedrals later. Such uncertainties may be responsible for some scattering<br />

in the data points above and below the fitted natural-growth curve.<br />

In any case one can safely draw the overall conclusion that Europe’s<br />

need for Gothic cathedrals was largely satisfied in a “natural” way by<br />

A.D. 1400 (Appendix C, Figure 3.5).<br />

In more recent times physicists have built laboratories of extravagant<br />

dimensions called particle accelerators or atom smashers. Some time<br />

ago in an inaugural speech, the director general of the European Center<br />

for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Geneva, where some of the world’s<br />

largest accelerators can be found, referred to particle accelerators as the<br />

cathedrals of today. This image suggested among other things that an<br />

end to this “species” should also be expected, so I decided to study their<br />

evolution and probe into their future. Atom smashers proliferated after<br />

World War II to produce a population whose growth has followed the<br />

same pattern as supertankers and cathedrals did before. The historical<br />

data I collected in this case consist of the number of particle accelerators<br />

coming into operation worldwide. The S-curve fitted on them approaches<br />

a ceiling in 1990 (Appendix C, Figure 3.6).<br />

Each accelerator counts as one even if the size of the device varied<br />

significantly over the years. The early setups were of modest dimensions.<br />

The Cosmotron of Brookhaven National Laboratory, where<br />

preliminary work for the discovery of the antiproton was carried out in<br />

the 1950s, was housed inside one big hall. At CERN, the ring of the<br />

electron accelerator LEP was completed in 1989. It measures eighteen<br />

miles in circumference, lies deep underground, and passes under suburbs<br />

of Geneva, several villages, and the nearby mountains. LEP’s underground<br />

tunnel was the largest and the last to be constructed. A later<br />

proposal for an accelerator in Texas, the Superconducting Super Collider<br />

(SSC), involving an underground tunnel with a circumference of<br />

almost fifty-four miles was rejected by the US government. The rejection<br />

came as a confirmation that the “dinosaur’s” size became too large<br />

for survival.<br />

One may think that accelerators like the Cosmotron and LEP, being<br />

so different in size, should not both count as one in defining the population.<br />

On the other hand, building the Cosmotron with the know-how of<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!