sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Visually sensitive receivers Visual receivers are those people who would be affected by landscape and streetscape impacts. They are assessed in terms of identifying places where people regularly congregate and include residential property, public buildings, public spaces, heritage items and key businesses. With reference to the proposal the visual receivers include: Occupiers of buildings fronting the proposal footprint and its intersecting roads Passengers, drivers and other road users (eg pedestrians and cyclists) travelling throughout the proposal footprint and its intersecting roads Café, restaurant, hotel and retail customers using the amenities and businesses fronting the proposal footprint and its intersecting roads Public open spaces such as parks, gardens and pedestrianised areas. The sensitivity of each receiver to the landscape and streetscape changes that would be introduced under the proposal is affected by a combination of whether: They would be permanently or temporarily affected (eg people that live in the city versus people that work in the city) The function and use of each receiver (eg a residential property versus a public open space) Their location relative to the proposal footprint. In the case of the proposal ground-floor receivers adjacent to the proposal footprint are assessed as being the most sensitive to change compared to those receivers either further away or located above ground-floor level. The above parameters were considered in this assessment such that the identified receivers are typically restricted to ground-floor businesses, public buildings and public spaces fronting the proposal footprint. It therefore typically excludes residential receivers as they are generally located above ground-floor level and in some instances set back from the proposal footprint. The few exceptions are described below. It was not feasible to assess the impact at every single receiver. Consequently, a number of representative receivers were selected for assessment, as set out in Table 6-42. These receivers are located adjacent to the locations in the proposal footprint where the more major traffic capacity improvements would be installed (as described in Table 3-2), specifically: Intersection reconfigurations and geometry modifications Kerb extension alterations Footpath width alterations. It therefore excludes receivers located adjacent to the following work sites (NW1: Kent Street, R3: Sussex Street, S1: Sussex Street and F2: Macquarie Street) as the proposal’s visual impact either during construction and operation is assessed as negligible (refer to Appendix I). Each receiver has been graded high (H), moderate (M) or low (L) according to its sensitivity to change. As noted above, all the selected receivers are located adjacent to the proposal footprint. Their sensitivity to change is therefore a combination of the receivers use and function and consequentially whether the people who congregate there would be temporarily or permanently affected by the change. Typically: Business premises would have a low sensitivity to change as they are only temporarily occupied during the daytime, evening or night and are already exposed to the visual impact of the existing road Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 343 Review of Environmental Factors
· Cafés, restaurants, hotels and pubs with no outdoor seating or dining would have a low to medium sensitivity to change as their patrons would only be temporarily affected by the proposal and the business does not rely on the kerbside. Consideration was also given as to whether these receivers are lower-end establishment (eg a fast food restaurant or backpacker hostels) or whether they are a higher-end establishment (eg a fine dining restaurant, four star hotels) · Cafés, restaurants, hotels and pubs with outdoor seating or dining areas are assessed as being typically more sensitive to change due to their reliance on the kerbside. Again consideration was given to the type of establishment · Retail premises would typically have a low sensitivity to change as their patrons would only be temporarily affected, however certain boutique or higher end or specialist retail stores were considered more-sensitive to change · Public buildings are assessed as having varying levels of sensitivity to change depending on their use · Public spaces, key land mark buildings and heritage listed buildings typically have a high sensitivity to change due to their role and function as well as the importance of their setting. Table 6-42 Location Representative visual receivers and their sensitivity to change Receiver * Items marked with an asterisk are heritage-listed Precinct 1: north west NW2: King Street E: Clarence Street intersection G: York Street intersection J: George Street to Pitt Street Precinct 2: retail R1: Park Street A: Pitt Street intersection R2: Market Street D: Clarence Street to York Street E:York Street intersection F: York Street to George Street Key businesses: China Southern (airline) (L), Subway (food store) (L) Key businesses: *Grace Hotel (hotel, bar, restaurants (with outdoor dining)) (H), Forbes Hotel (bar) (M) and CBD Hotel (bar, restaurant) (M) Key businesses: Hugo Boss (retail store) (M), Ben Sherman (retail store) (M), Mont Blanc (retail store) (M) Key businesses: Lowes (retail store) (L), Criterion Hotel (bar) (M) Key businesses: Westpac (high-rise office headquarters) (L) Key businesses: Commonwealth Bank (high-rise office headquarters) (L) Public buildings: *Queen Victoria Building (H) Key businesses: Commonwealth Bank (high-rise office headquarters) (L) Public buildings: *Queen Victoria Building (H) Sydney City Centre Capacity Improvement 344 Review of Environmental Factors
Page 1 and 2:
Sydney City Centre Capacity Improve
Page 3 and 4:
Executive summary The proposal Road
Page 5 and 6:
the proposed Sydney City Centre Cyc
Page 7 and 8:
The REF concludes that the proposal
Page 9 and 10:
Effect Affected factors/receivers L
Page 11 and 12:
Effect Temporary light spill impact
Page 13 and 14:
maintenance of traffic flows in the
Page 15 and 16:
What happens next? Following the su
Page 17 and 18:
6.7 Water quality and hydrology ...
Page 19 and 20:
If approved, the proposal would tak
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
In doing so, the REF helps fulfil t
Page 25 and 26:
2 Need and options considered This
Page 27 and 28:
NSW Long Term Transport Master Plan
Page 29 and 30:
2.2 Existing road and public transp
Page 31 and 32:
Road Sussex Street between King Str
Page 33 and 34:
Road Precinct 4: college Wentworth
Page 35 and 36:
Bus stop hubs located at Circular Q
Page 37 and 38:
With these allocations set, Transpo
Page 39 and 40:
2.4.2 Identified proposal options P
Page 41 and 42:
Precinct 2: retail Precinct 2: reta
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Precinct 3: southern Precinct 3: so
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Precinct 4: college Precinct 4: col
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
NW2: King Street (two options) Traf
Page 55 and 56:
Amenity All three options reallocat
Page 57 and 58:
Amenity At present, buses cannot re
Page 59 and 60:
Summary Table 2-6 ‘Option b’ an
Page 61 and 62:
Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
Page 63 and 64:
Table 2-7 Analysis of options in pr
Page 65 and 66:
Amenity Kerbside use Business impac
Page 67 and 68:
3 Description of the proposal The p
Page 69 and 70:
Work site reference Section Start a
Page 71 and 72:
Table 3-2 Typical traffic capacity
Page 73 and 74:
Typical improvement (with example)
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Sussex Street to Kent Street Sussex
Page 81 and 82:
George Street to Pitt Street York S
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Kent Street intersection Pitt Stree
Page 91 and 92:
Pitt Street to Castlereagh Street G
Page 93 and 94:
Margaret Street to Erskine Street J
Page 95 and 96:
Market Street intersection King Str
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Liverpool Street to Eager Lane Jame
Page 111 and 112:
Hay Street to Rawson Place Goulburn
Page 113 and 114:
Abercrombie Street intersection Ref
Page 115 and 116:
Ref (refer Fig 3-10 to 3-16) Propos
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Wemyss Lane to Goulburn Street Ref
Page 129 and 130:
Macquarie Street intersection Campb
Page 131 and 132:
Park Street to Oxford Street Prince
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
3.2 Design The proposal’s concept
Page 147 and 148:
Table 3-9 Engineering and developme
Page 149 and 150:
3.3 Construction activities The lik
Page 151 and 152:
Table 3-10 Plant and equipment - in
Page 153 and 154:
These materials are widely availabl
Page 155 and 156:
Once the work is complete on site,
Page 157 and 158:
3.6 Public utility and drainage adj
Page 159 and 160:
Traffic capacity improvement Precin
Page 161 and 162:
Traffic capacity improvement Locati
Page 163 and 164:
4.1.3 Darling Harbour Development P
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
The adopted urban design principles
Page 169 and 170:
Principles and objectives Consisten
Page 171 and 172:
Principles and objectives Prot
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Roads and Maritime is, however, req
Page 179 and 180:
The one adverse outcome to deliveri
Page 181 and 182:
5.1.2 Stakeholder engagement Roads
Page 183 and 184:
The detailed design would also be d
Page 185 and 186:
Traffic modelling and monitoring da
Page 187 and 188:
Bus infrastructure There is an exte
Page 189 and 190:
Cars, buses and other vehicles Over
Page 191 and 192:
Level of Service (LoS) Maximum queu
Page 193 and 194:
Work site location Precinct 4: coll
Page 195 and 196:
Section G: York Street intersection
Page 197 and 198:
Section Precinct 4: college C1: Wen
Page 199 and 200:
Location and type of work (refer to
Page 201 and 202:
with the proposed changes under the
Page 203 and 204:
Loading zones Mobility parking spac
Page 205 and 206:
Table 6-8 describes the temporary o
Page 207 and 208:
Location J: George Street to Pitt S
Page 209 and 210:
Location H: Hay Street to Rawson Pl
Page 211 and 212:
As can be seen from Table 6-8, ther
Page 213 and 214:
Table 6-9 Altered footpaths and ped
Page 215 and 216:
Section D: Abercrombie Street inter
Page 217 and 218:
Loading zones Mobility parking spac
Page 219 and 220:
Table F-2 in Appendix F provides fu
Page 221 and 222:
Level of Service (LoS) Maximum queu
Page 223 and 224:
The above table demonstrates the va
Page 225 and 226:
Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Table 6-13 Construction noise manag
Page 231 and 232:
The applicable human comfort vibrat
Page 233 and 234:
where the corresponding noise impac
Page 235 and 236:
The modelling predicted the constru
Page 237 and 238:
Work site Receiver type NML for the
Page 239 and 240:
Work site Receiver type NML for the
Page 241 and 242:
The highest predicted noise impacts
Page 243 and 244:
Work site Precinct 3: southern Pred
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Post World War II, Sydney enhanced
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Table 6-21 Heritage listed items It
Page 257 and 258:
Item name Section Location Signific
Page 259 and 260:
Item name Section Location Signific
Page 261 and 262:
Item name Area of archaeology poten
Page 263 and 264:
Item name 21 Former value and item
Page 265 and 266:
Item name Works with potential heri
Page 267 and 268:
Item name R2 Market Street Works wi
Page 269 and 270:
Item name 3 Pinnacle House 5 Commer
Page 271 and 272:
Item name Precinct 3: southern S3:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Item name F2: Macquarie Street Work
Page 279 and 280:
Lighting pole relocation General si
Page 281 and 282:
Reference Potential archaeological
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
The above summary reflects that the
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
6.4.2 Existing environment Populati
Page 293 and 294:
Social infrastructure Cultural and
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Social infrastructure - constructio
Page 303 and 304:
Table 6-27 Annual events potentiall
Page 305 and 306:
Table 6-28 Location specific potent
Page 307 and 308:
Work site Construction activities I
Page 309 and 310: Work site Construction activities I
Page 321 and 322: Socioeconomic impacts during operat
Page 323 and 324: The improvements to connectivity an
Page 325 and 326: Work site D: Kent Street to Clarenc
Page 327 and 328: Work site D: Clarence Street to Yor
Page 329 and 330: Work site F: Erskine Street to Barr
Page 331 and 332: Work site F: Liverpool Street to Ea
Page 333 and 334: Work site C: Wattle Street intersec
Page 335 and 336: Work site D: Wemyss Lane to Goulbur
Page 337 and 338: Work site F: Park Street to Oxford
Page 339 and 340: Method and assessment criteria The
Page 341 and 342: General land use character General
Page 343 and 344: Development precinct Precinct 1: re
Page 345 and 346: Property Roadside property Table 6-
Page 347 and 348: Future land uses and development pr
Page 349 and 350: Rubbish bins Water fountains City m
Page 351 and 352: Impact Environmental safeguard Resp
Page 353 and 354: 6.6.2 Existing environment Landscap
Page 355 and 356: Landscape character zone Overview d
Page 357 and 358: Tree characteristics The city centr
Page 359: Table 6-41 Registered significant t
Page 363 and 364: Location Receiver * Items marked wi
Page 365 and 366: Table 6-43 Temporary construction l
Page 367 and 368: Work site Section Receiver F1: Macq
Page 369 and 370: Landscape character and visual impa
Page 371 and 372: The tree’s consistency and contri
Page 373 and 374: Table 6-46 Tree pruning and removal
Page 375 and 376: Turning restrictions and provisions
Page 377 and 378: Work site Section Visual receiver R
Page 383 and 384: Despite this, Sydney Harbour suppor
Page 385 and 386: The proposal footprint is located a
Page 387 and 388: Flood risk The proposal footprint h
Page 391 and 392: to contamination or the generation
Page 393 and 394: Acid sulphate soils Acid sulphate s
Page 395 and 396: Contaminated land (records) No site
Page 397 and 398: Geology and soil impacts during ope
Page 399 and 400: Biodiversity Guidelines: Protecting
Page 401 and 402: Table 6-56 Statutorily protected bi
Page 405 and 406: 6.10.2 Potential impacts Waste gene
Page 407 and 408: In addition, the contractor(s) woul
Page 411 and 412:
6.11.4 Safeguards and management me
Page 413 and 414:
Affected roads There are no screeni
Page 415 and 416:
Air quality sensitive receivers The
Page 417 and 418:
the roads covered by the proposal f
Page 419 and 420:
Greenhouse Gas Assessment Workbook
Page 421 and 422:
Climate change construction impacts
Page 423 and 424:
6.14 Hazard and risk This section a
Page 425 and 426:
Hazard Potential consequence Key se
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
6.15.2 Other committed and/or appro
Page 431 and 432:
Project Description Location and in
Page 433 and 434:
Project Description Location and in
Page 435 and 436:
Table 6-68 Potential cumulative imp
Page 437 and 438:
Cumulative effect Disruption to pub
Page 439 and 440:
Cumulative effect Key issues
Page 441 and 442:
Cumulative effect Key issues Street
Page 443 and 444:
Table 6-69 Potential cumulative eff
Page 445 and 446:
6.15.4 Safeguards and management me
Page 447 and 448:
Page 449 and 450:
Page 451 and 452:
7 Environmental management This cha
Page 453 and 454:
No Impact Environmental safeguard R
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Page 459 and 460:
Page 461 and 462:
Page 463 and 464:
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
Page 479 and 480:
8 Conclusion This chapter provides
Page 481 and 482:
Object environment. 5(a)(ii) To enc
Page 483 and 484:
8.3 Ecologically sustainable develo
Page 485 and 486:
8.3.4 Improved valuation, pricing a
Page 487 and 488:
9 Certification This review of envi
Page 489 and 490:
City of Sydney Council, Sydney City
Page 491 and 492:
NSW EPA 1997c, Waste Reduction and
Page 493 and 494:
factors-june-2014.pdf, accessed: 2/
Page 495:
ISEPP State Environmental Planning
show all

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?