24.11.2014 Views

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

sydney-city-centre-review-of-environmental-factors

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

disorientated immediately following the proposed tree pruning and removal. This<br />

would be most likely along Macquarie Street due to the removal <strong>of</strong> the two London<br />

Plane trees along the western kerb (work site: F1: Macquarie Street) (refer to<br />

section 6.6.3). This could cause a break in established flight lines between Hyde<br />

Park and the Domain/Botanic Garden. However, bat species are generally adaptive<br />

and find alternative routes. This would be assisted by the widespread presence <strong>of</strong><br />

alternative structures to echolocate <strong>of</strong>f. As such, the impact is assessed as<br />

negligible.<br />

There is the potential to injure or kill fauna when removing/pruning the trees. There is<br />

also a remote potential for larger nocturnal ground-dwelling species to fall into open<br />

excavation trenches. However both impacts are considered unlikely given the limited<br />

habitat potential <strong>of</strong> the proposal footprint and, in the case <strong>of</strong> species entrapment, the<br />

potential for such an impact to occur would be remote.<br />

Statutorily protected biodiversity<br />

As noted above, whilst the grey-headed flying fox may intermittently shelter or forage<br />

over the proposal footprint it is improbable that it depends on any <strong>of</strong> the affected<br />

trees for its survival. Consequently, as the proposal is unlikely to have a significant<br />

effect on this species and no assessment <strong>of</strong> significance under the TSC Act<br />

Assessment Guidelines (refer to section 6.9.1) is required.<br />

There are no anticipated impacts on species listed under either FM Act or EPBC Act<br />

due to the limited biodiversity values <strong>of</strong> the proposal footprint.<br />

Biodiversity impacts during operation<br />

Despite introducing traffic improvements in certain locations around the <strong>city</strong> <strong>centre</strong><br />

the proposal would not impact on land with associated biodiversity values.<br />

Consequently, there would be no operational impacts.<br />

6.9.4 Safeguards and management measures<br />

Table 6-57 lists the biodiversity safeguards and management measures that would<br />

be implemented to address the impacts identified above in section 6.9.3.<br />

Table 6-57<br />

Biodiversity safeguards and management measures<br />

Impact Environmental safeguard Responsibility Timing<br />

Biodiversity<br />

management<br />

across the<br />

entire proposal<br />

footprint<br />

Prepare a biodiversity management<br />

plan (BMP) as a sub-plan <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CEMP. As a minimum, the plan<br />

would:<br />

<br />

Provide for the discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

unexpected threatened flora or<br />

fauna. The provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

Standard Management<br />

Procedure: Unexpected<br />

Threatened Species Finds<br />

(Roads and Maritime, 2011)<br />

would be subsequently<br />

implemented.<br />

Construction<br />

contractor<br />

Preconstruction<br />

Construction<br />

Sydney City Centre Capa<strong>city</strong> Improvement 385<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> Environmental Factors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!