30.11.2012 Views

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

E-Book of Articles - World Federation of Music Therapy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bonde, Lars Ole: Analogy And Metapher In <strong>Music</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> Theory ...<br />

client. And the client’s imagery may seem transpersonal (cf. Lewis 1998) yet<br />

still be stream-<strong>of</strong>-consciousness. Metaphors <strong>of</strong> defense and resistance are as<br />

important to consider as metaphors <strong>of</strong> transformation. The quality and<br />

potential <strong>of</strong> images and metaphors can only be determined in the narrative<br />

context and configuration <strong>of</strong> the therapeutic process.<br />

Theoretically I think the identification <strong>of</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> imagery -<br />

especially the identification <strong>of</strong> the psychotherapeutic level <strong>of</strong> the imagery -<br />

can be furthered considering the theory <strong>of</strong> metaphor by Paul Ricoeur.<br />

Ricoeur’s theory <strong>of</strong> metaphors and narratives<br />

existence”.<br />

“When changing its fantasy a human being changes its<br />

Ricoeur’s theory <strong>of</strong> narrative starts with a critique <strong>of</strong> Aristotle. In the<br />

classical lexical theory metaphor is merely ornamentation in language. In<br />

contrast, Ricoeur understands metaphor as “a semantic event made possible<br />

by three kinds (levels or elements) <strong>of</strong> tension....Metaphor announces an<br />

explosion <strong>of</strong> meaning (the text is broken open to the life-world [Husserl’s<br />

“Lebenswelt”, comment LOB)] for the first time) to more.”(McGaughey<br />

1992) He agrees with Ernst Cassirer in his view <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> the metaphor,<br />

when he asks: “Can one not say that the strategy <strong>of</strong> language at work in<br />

metaphor consists in obliterating the logical and establishing frontiers <strong>of</strong><br />

language, in order to bring to light new resemblances the previous<br />

classification kept us from seeing? In other words, the power <strong>of</strong> metaphor<br />

would be to break an old categorization, in order to establish new logical<br />

frontiers on the ruins <strong>of</strong> their forerunners?” (Ricoeur 1977, p. 197) Now, how<br />

does the metaphor ‘break old categorizations’? It does it through semantic<br />

tension.<br />

The three levels <strong>of</strong> tension are:<br />

“(a) tension within the statement: between tenor and vehicle, between<br />

focus and frame, between principle subject and secondary subject;<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!