13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

any new system we must construct or uncover another system beyond it. Over <strong>and</strong> over thiscycle must be repeated to determine the consistency <strong>of</strong> more <strong>and</strong> more elaborate systems 91 .Boyd not only referred to original works <strong>of</strong> these authors. Additionally, severalauthors whose books Boyd had read describe these fundamental changes <strong>and</strong> point at thesimilarities <strong>of</strong> the philosophical <strong>and</strong> epistemological implications 92 . Capra wrote in 1975 that‘the classical mechanistic world view had to be ab<strong>and</strong>oned at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this [20 th ]century when quantum theory <strong>and</strong> relativity theory forced us to adopt a much more subtle,holistic, <strong>and</strong> “organic” view <strong>of</strong> nature’ 93 . As Paul Davies noted in a popular book included inBoyd’s list <strong>of</strong> personal papers, in the 1920s a revolution occurred in fundamental physics thatshook the scientific community <strong>and</strong> focused attention as never before on the relationbetween observer <strong>and</strong> the external world. It forms a pillar in what has become known as thenew physics, <strong>and</strong> provides the most convincing scientific evidence yet that consciousnessplays an essential role in the nature <strong>of</strong> physical reality. And by the 1970s this idea, accordingto Davies, had finally percolated through to the layman 94 . Gell-Mann too, another “father”<strong>of</strong> the new sciences, recently pointed to the intellectual foundations laid by Gödel <strong>and</strong>Heisenberg 95 , while Uri Merry stated that the old paradigm is breaking down ‘under thecombined onslaught <strong>of</strong> the findings <strong>of</strong> quantum theory; Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle;Gödel’s theorem; the discoveries <strong>of</strong> chaos, complexity, self-organization, evolution,autopoeisis in living systems, <strong>and</strong> other breakthroughs in science’ 96 . In hindsight Boyd thuswas on solid grounds to base his work on the emerging worldview.Although Rifkin mentions Heisenberg <strong>and</strong> the Second Law in one chapter arguingthat ‘the static view <strong>of</strong> the worl has been replaced by the view that everything in the world isalways in the process <strong>of</strong> becoming’ 97 , few contemporaries however made the directconnection between thermodynamics, Heisenberg <strong>and</strong> Gödel. In light <strong>of</strong> the fact he readMonod 98 , Capra, Davies, Rifkin, Prigogine, Heisenberg <strong>and</strong> Gödel, <strong>and</strong> because he hadbecome intimately familiar with thermodynamics in Georgia Tech, it may not seem such aremarkable conceptual leap. It was however a genuine creative original act, most certainly inthe realm <strong>of</strong> military thought 99 .91 Boyd, Destruction <strong>and</strong> Creation, pp.8-9.92 And besides the already mentioned early works <strong>of</strong> Capra, etc., that are listed in the bibliographies <strong>of</strong>his first papers, his personal papers reveal an astounding number <strong>of</strong> books on the history <strong>of</strong> science.Early works that describe the stunning advances in physics in the first halve <strong>of</strong> the 20 th century includefor instance George Gamow Thirty Years That Shook Physics, <strong>The</strong> Story <strong>of</strong> Quantum Physics (1966), WernerHeisenberg's Physics <strong>and</strong> Philosophy: <strong>The</strong> Revolution in Modern <strong>Science</strong> (1962).93 Fritj<strong>of</strong> Capra, <strong>The</strong> Tao <strong>of</strong> Physics (3 nd edition, 1991), p. 54. <strong>The</strong> first edition <strong>of</strong> 1975 already includedthis passage.94 Paul Davies, God <strong>and</strong> the New Physics (Penguin Books, 1990), pp.100-101. This book was firstpublished in 1983. Interestingly, Davies notes how ‘many modern writers are finding close parallelsbetween the concept used in the quantum theory <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> oriental mysticism, such as Zen’.95 Gell-Mann’s chapters 3 <strong>and</strong> 11, deal with information <strong>and</strong> quantum mechanics respectively.96 Uri Merry, Coping with Uncertainty, Insights from the New <strong>Science</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Chaos, Self-organization <strong>and</strong> Complexity(Westport, Connecticut, 1995), p.100.97 Rifkin (1980), p.227.98 Monod held that living things as isolated self-contained energetic systems, seem to operate againstentropy, <strong>and</strong> that different life forms will battle against each other until a greater disorder takes overagain.99 Paul Davies had included the three in his 1983 book God <strong>and</strong> the New Physics. Prigogine included,besides Heisenberg <strong>and</strong> Gödel, explicitly the Second Law <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>rmodynamics, however, this was inhis seminal work published in 1984 99 .99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!