13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In light <strong>of</strong> his previous observation on the importance <strong>of</strong> the ability to adapt to change, it is anoteworthy slide for it lists effects, which show an increasing level <strong>of</strong> erosion <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>of</strong>mental/moral coherence with the subsequent decreasing capability to cope <strong>and</strong> respondadequately. In addition, he returns to the theme <strong>of</strong> fast transients <strong>and</strong> the Darwinianperspective he started Patterns <strong>of</strong> Conflict with.In the following figure these terms have been arranged so as to depict the causalchain that is formed by the induced effects, according to Boyd’s slide. <strong>The</strong> dotted boxesindicate the desired ultimate effects, the ultimate aim.AmbiguityDeceptionNoveltyFast-transient man’s(maneuvers, events, states)Effort (threat)DisorientationSurprise shock DisruptioncollapseparalysisLoss <strong>of</strong>cohesionFor Boyd, this still does not sufficiently capture the essence <strong>of</strong> maneuver conflict. Heincreases the emphasis on the theme <strong>of</strong> adaptability when he states next that ‘shock <strong>and</strong>surprise can also be regarded as an overload caused by a welter <strong>of</strong> threatening events beyondone’s mental or physical ability to respond <strong>and</strong> adapt or endure’. This results in a slightlyamended version <strong>of</strong> the slide above. It contains two notable differences. It not only regardsdisorientation the only element affecting adaptability, but now also the element <strong>of</strong> overloaddue to ‘a welter <strong>of</strong> threatening events’. So adaptability is affected not only by ambiguousinformation <strong>and</strong> uncertainty, but is also compounded by fear due to threatening events.Moreover, Boyd modifies his aim. <strong>The</strong> employment <strong>of</strong> the various elements <strong>of</strong>maneuver conflict may not directly result in collapse, as one may have interpreted hisstatement on the “aim <strong>of</strong> maneuver conflict”. In stead, he considers it equally valuable to aimfor the creation <strong>of</strong> many isolated remnant <strong>of</strong> enemy forces that can later be mopped up. Inlight <strong>of</strong> the critique that Boyd, like Sun Tzu expects victory through merely going throughOODA cycles more rapidly, this is not a trivial transition.212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!