13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

implementation <strong>of</strong> the right program. <strong>The</strong> mind is not just a functional organization <strong>of</strong>matter 150 .<strong>The</strong> human nervous system interacts with the environment by continuallymodulating its structure, <strong>and</strong> emotions <strong>and</strong> experience play a large role in human intelligence,human memory <strong>and</strong> decisions (this will be further addressed in the next chapter). Moreover,conceptualizing the brain as an information processing devise is flawed for the human mindthinks with ideas, not with information. Ideas create information, they are the integratingpatterns that derive not from information but from experience. As Paul Davies suggested toBoyd, ‘the essential ingredient <strong>of</strong> the mind is information. It is the pattern inside the brain,not the brain itself, that makes us what we are’ 151 . Moreover, in the computer model <strong>of</strong>cognition, knowledge is seen as context <strong>and</strong> value free, based on abstract data. But allmeaningful knowledge is contextual knowledge, <strong>and</strong> much <strong>of</strong> it is tacit <strong>and</strong> experiential. AsBoyd was aware, the psychologist Jean Piaget <strong>and</strong> later neo-Darwinists Monod, Dawkins <strong>and</strong>Wilson all talked about mental structures. Dawkins <strong>and</strong> Wilson advanced the idea thatgenetics <strong>and</strong> culture (in that order) play a substantial role 152 . Thus, the cognitive revolutionmade common currency <strong>of</strong> the view that complex behavior is, in large part at least,controlled by inner representational states 153 . As Piaget stated, ‘all learning <strong>and</strong> rememberingdepend upon antecedent structures’ 154 . This does not invalidate cybernetics, merely theunwarranted metaphor <strong>of</strong> the mind as a computer 155 .In systems thinking, <strong>and</strong> in Boyd’s model, these insights are partly incorporated byintroducing the concept <strong>of</strong> generative learning - or double loop learning - <strong>and</strong> the notions <strong>of</strong> mentalmodels, or cognitive maps. A cognitive map is an internal image or other mental representation<strong>of</strong> spatial relationships (or other kinds <strong>of</strong> knowledge), which allows one to choose alternativepaths towards one’s goals. Mental models consist <strong>of</strong> general ideas that shape one’s thoughts<strong>and</strong> actions <strong>and</strong> lead one to expect certain results. <strong>The</strong>y are theories in use, based mostly onobservation <strong>and</strong> experience. <strong>The</strong>y form belief systems. <strong>The</strong>y give meaning to events. Weinterpret our experience in light <strong>of</strong> them. <strong>The</strong>y are formed through socialization, culture <strong>and</strong>experience, elements Boyd would include in his OODA model as well 156 .In generative learning we allow our mental models to be influenced, perhapschanged, by the feedback. It provides one with a wider number <strong>of</strong> choices, new strategies<strong>and</strong> decision rules to apply. It leads to questioning one’s assumptions <strong>and</strong> seeing a situationin a different way 157 . When a person becomes exposed to a new perception or an experience,150 Rick Grush, 'Cognitive <strong>Science</strong>', in Machamer <strong>and</strong> Silberstein, pp.273-277. This revolution wasbrought about by (among others) Noam Chomsky who's work was explicitly directed against Skinner'sbehaviorist theory <strong>of</strong> language. Chomsky provied powerful arguments to the effect that no purelystimulus-driven mechanism could possibly learn the structure <strong>of</strong> natural language, <strong>and</strong> that rather,language learning seemd to require at least some innate cognitive representational structures whichcircunscribed possible grammars that were then selected from by exposure to linguistic data. Rat brainresearch (which Boyd read about) furthermore suggested the presence <strong>of</strong> cognitive maps.151 Davies (1983), p.98.152 In Structuralism, Piaget advanced the idea that there are “mental structures” that exist midwaybetween genes <strong>and</strong> behavior. Mental structures built up as the organism develops <strong>and</strong> encounters theworld. Structures are theoretic, deductive, a process. Interestingly, Piaget was influenced by , a.o.,Ludwig von Bertalanffy. See Watson, pp.629-630.153 Grush, p.275.154 Piaget (1971), p.51.155 Capra, 1996, pp.51-68.156 O’Connor & McDermott, pp.63-65. In the next chapter the concept <strong>of</strong> schema(ta) will bediscussed in the context <strong>of</strong> complexity theory. Schemata can be considered similar to mental modules.157 Ibid, p.124.110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!