13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Physical as well as electrical <strong>and</strong> chemical connections in the brain are shaped by interactingwith the environment. Point: without these interactions we do not have the mentalwherewithal to deal or cope with that environment.Gödel’s Incompleteness <strong>The</strong>orems, Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle, <strong>and</strong> the Second Law<strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong>rmodynamics, all taken together, show that we cannot determine the character ornature <strong>of</strong> a system within itself. Moreover, attempts to do so lead to confusion <strong>and</strong> disorder -- mental as well as physical. Point: We need an external environment, or outside world, todefine ourselves <strong>and</strong> maintain organic integrity, otherwise we experiencedissolution/disintegration--i.e., we come unglued.Living systems are open systems; closed systems are non-living systems. Point: If we don’tcommunicate with the outside world -- to gain information for knowledge <strong>and</strong>underst<strong>and</strong>ing as well as matter <strong>and</strong> energy for sustenance -- we die out to become a nondiscerning<strong>and</strong> uninteresting part <strong>of</strong> that world.Beyond open en chaotic systems: complexity theoryComplex Adaptive Systems<strong>The</strong>se concepts return in Complexity <strong>The</strong>ory. Complexity <strong>The</strong>ory <strong>and</strong> Chaos <strong>The</strong>ory arenow mostly mentioned interchangeably. Indeed, the term chaoplexity has been coined. It isnot so much an organized rigorous theory than a collection <strong>of</strong> ideas that have in commonthe notion that within dynamic patterns there may be underlying simplicity. It includes <strong>and</strong>builds upon the notions laid out above. In 1987 the publication <strong>of</strong> James Gleick’s Chaos:Making a New <strong>Science</strong> introduced this new area <strong>of</strong> intellectual activity 40 . In the late 1980s <strong>and</strong>early 1990s chaos suddenly blossomed as one <strong>of</strong> the most popular forms <strong>of</strong> mathematics. Anew research outfit was founded, the Santa-Fe Institute, which focused on chaotic <strong>and</strong>complex systems. Mitchell Waldrop’s account <strong>of</strong> the emergence (!) <strong>of</strong> this field <strong>of</strong> research<strong>and</strong> the institute became a bestseller 41 . It marked the neo-Darwinian era which clearly Boydderived inspiration from. Boyd’s work includes several references that support the idea thatadaptability <strong>and</strong> evolution are key themes in his work.Briefly stated, Complexity <strong>The</strong>ory examines emergent order in large, interactive,adaptive networks such as neural networks or ecosystems. <strong>The</strong>se Complex Adaptive Systems(CAS) co-evolve with the environment through self-organizing behavior <strong>of</strong> agents navigating“the fitness l<strong>and</strong>scapes”. <strong>The</strong> theory includes such ideas as phase change, fitness l<strong>and</strong>scapes,self-organization, emergence, attractors, symmetry <strong>and</strong> symmetry breaking, chaos <strong>and</strong>, theedge <strong>of</strong> chaos 42 . In the brief introduction <strong>of</strong> Walrop, complexity theory deals with behaviorat “the edge <strong>of</strong> chaos” where spontaneous organization, life <strong>and</strong> consciousness can occur,<strong>and</strong> it thus incorporates insights <strong>of</strong> chaos theory. Yet it transcends it because complexsystems somehow acquired the ability to bring order <strong>and</strong> chaos into a special balance (i.e.,the edge <strong>of</strong> chaos), they never quite lock into place, yet never quite dissolve into turbulence40 Watson, p.747. Watson refers to James Gleick, Chaos, Making a New <strong>Science</strong> (Penguin Books, NewYork, 1987).41 See Mitchell Waldrop, Complexity: <strong>The</strong> Emerging <strong>Science</strong> at the Edge <strong>of</strong> Order <strong>and</strong> Chaos (Viking, London ,1993).42 Michael Lissack, ‘Complexity: the <strong>Science</strong>, its Vocabulary, <strong>and</strong> its Relation to Organizations’,Emergence, Vol. 1, Issue 1, (1999), p.112.133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!