13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong>se insights implied, for Boyd, that:We need to create mental images, views, or impressions, hence patterns that match withactivity <strong>of</strong> world.Systems theory enters strategy when Boyd next advances the idea that:We need to deny adversary the possibility <strong>of</strong> uncovering or discerning patterns that matchour activity, or other aspects <strong>of</strong> reality in the world 188 .<strong>The</strong> systems theoretical principle <strong>of</strong> the necessity <strong>of</strong> applying a multitude <strong>of</strong> perspectivescomes to the fore when Boyd asserts in Organic Design:Orientation is an interactive process <strong>of</strong> many sided implicit cross-referencing projections,empathies, correlations <strong>and</strong> rejections […] 189 .expose individuals, with different skills <strong>and</strong> abilities, against a variety <strong>of</strong> situations - wherebyeach individual can observe <strong>and</strong> orient himself simultaneously to the others <strong>and</strong> to thevariety <strong>of</strong> changing situations 190 .In <strong>The</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> Game <strong>of</strong> ? & ?, which he finished one month after completing Organic Design,he includes several statements referring to this theme, exemplifying the fact that indeed thisissue is <strong>of</strong> an essential nature for Boyd:To discern what is going on we must interact in a variety <strong>of</strong> ways with our environment.We must be able to examine the world from a number <strong>of</strong> perspectives so that we cangenerate mental images or impressions that correspond to that world 191 .We can’t just look at our own personal experiences or use the same mental recipes over <strong>and</strong>over again; we’ve got to look at other disciplines <strong>and</strong> activities <strong>and</strong> relate or connect them towhat we know from our experiences <strong>and</strong> the strategic world we live in 192 .When he discusses the ways to maintain interaction with the ever changing world so as toensure one’s ability to adapt, he asserts further that this is accomplished:ConclusionBy an instinctive see-saw <strong>of</strong> analysis <strong>and</strong> synthesis across a variety <strong>of</strong> domains, or acrosscompeting/independent channels <strong>of</strong> information, in order to spontaneously generate newmental images or impressions that match up with an unfolding world <strong>of</strong> uncertainty <strong>and</strong>change 193 .Scientific debates <strong>and</strong> insights thus directly informed Boyd’s thinking, <strong>and</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> theworks Boyd studied <strong>and</strong> the themes he was interested in help explain his work. As science188 Ibid, p.16. underlining in original.189 Ibid, p.15.190 Ibid, p.18.191 <strong>Strategic</strong> Game <strong>of</strong> ? & ?, p.10.192 Ibid, p.45.193 Ibid, p.58.119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!