13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This then leads to the second wrap-up <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> moral conflict, which combines thenegative <strong>and</strong> the positive factors, the <strong>of</strong>fensive as well as the defensive side 112 .Negative factorsCounterweightsMenace:Impression <strong>of</strong> danger to one's well -being <strong>and</strong>survival.Initiative:Internal drive to think <strong>and</strong> take action withoutbeing urged.Uncertainty:Impressions, or atmosphere, generated by eventsthat appear ambiguous, erratic, contradictory,unfamiliar, chaotic, etc.Mistrust:Atmosphere <strong>of</strong> doubt <strong>and</strong> suspicion that loosesnhuman bonds among members <strong>of</strong> an organicwhole or between organic wholesAdaptability:Power to adjust or change in order to copewith new or unforeseen circumstances.Harmony:Interaction <strong>of</strong> apparently disconnected eventsor entities in a connected way.AimPump-up friction via negative factors to breed fear, anxiety, <strong>and</strong> alienation in order to generate many noncooperativecenters <strong>of</strong> gravity, as well as subvert those that adversary depends upon, thereby sever moral bondsthat permit adversary to exist as an organic whole.Build-up <strong>and</strong> play counterweights against negative factors to diminish internal friction, as well as surfacecourage, confidence, <strong>and</strong> esprit, thereby make possible the human interactions needed to create moral bondsthat permit us, as an organic whole to shape <strong>and</strong> adapt to changeSynthesis: pattern for successful operationsA short look back. By now Boyd is ready to come slowly to his abstract synthesis <strong>of</strong> thedynamics <strong>and</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> winning <strong>and</strong> losing. In the first pages <strong>of</strong> Patterns <strong>of</strong> Conflict he haslaid out the aim <strong>of</strong> this presentation <strong>and</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> key themes <strong>and</strong> suggestions, <strong>of</strong>fering infact already the contours <strong>of</strong> his main argument. He has taken his audience through detaileddiscussions <strong>of</strong> the style <strong>of</strong> warfare as practiced by Sun Tzu, Alex<strong>and</strong>er, Ghengis Khan <strong>and</strong>the early Bonaparte. He has argued that from the later Napoleonic battles to the First World<strong>War</strong> bloody <strong>and</strong> wasteful attrition warfare was tragically en vogue. <strong>The</strong> solution to the costlyloss <strong>of</strong> flexibility, to the stalemate <strong>of</strong> the trenches, was provided by infiltration tactics.Together with the development <strong>of</strong> the Blitzkrieg concept, Lawrence’s version <strong>of</strong> guerrillawarfare <strong>and</strong> communist revolutionary warfare, this period manifested a de facto rediscovery<strong>of</strong> the teachings <strong>of</strong> Sun Tzu. Boyd then gradually shifts to higher levels <strong>of</strong> abstraction in hiscompression <strong>of</strong> the different styles <strong>of</strong> warfare to the key elements <strong>and</strong> fundamental dynamics<strong>of</strong> each. Based on this favored maneuver <strong>and</strong> moral categories <strong>of</strong> conflict, he now moves onto get to the most general <strong>and</strong> abstract formulation <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> strategy. In twentypages he brings it all together, from the tactical to the gr<strong>and</strong> strategic level, coming full circleto the ideas he bluntly put forward in his introduction. But by now he has taken his audiencethrough 2500 years <strong>of</strong> military history <strong>and</strong> strategic thought to argue his points.112 Ibid, p.125.216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!