13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> general underlying idea <strong>of</strong> Counter-Blitz, according to Boyd, is thus to:Pull adversary apart <strong>and</strong> bring about his collapse by causing him to generate or projectmental images that agree neither with the faster tempo/rhythm nor with the hidden form <strong>of</strong>the transient maneuver patterns he must compete against 137 .After a 17 page discussion <strong>of</strong> the German Blitz campaigns, <strong>and</strong> the successful RussianCounter-Blitz, which serves to illustrate this underlying idea, Boyd arrives at the section <strong>of</strong>Patterns <strong>of</strong> Conflict, in which he ties the various key insights together in 5 pages <strong>and</strong> produces aconclusion <strong>of</strong> Boyd view on the art <strong>of</strong> success.Wrap Up, or coming full circleWhat ‘getting inside the enemy’s OODA loop means. <strong>The</strong> wrap-up is a highlyconceptual synthesis <strong>and</strong> reformulation <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> his previous arguments, ideas <strong>and</strong> themes. Itincludes direct reference to his earliest intuitive remarks as well as his last argumentconcerning the importance <strong>of</strong> shaping the opponent’s perception. Here Boyd ab<strong>and</strong>ons thedivision in tactical, gr<strong>and</strong> tactical <strong>and</strong> strategic levels but combines them. He does not referto attrition, maneuver or moral conflict anywhere, but merges the essence <strong>of</strong> the latter two.He attempts to strip away <strong>and</strong> recombine even further than before to arrive at the mostconcise formula for explaining success <strong>and</strong> failure in conflict. In a sense the wrap-up isBoyd’s way <strong>of</strong> proving he has validated the assertions he made in the first section <strong>of</strong> Patterns<strong>of</strong> Conflict. On page 12 he had asserted that ‘variety, rapidity, harmony <strong>and</strong> initiative seem tobe the key qualities that permit one to shape <strong>and</strong> adapt to an ever-changing environment’. Inthe ‘Wrap Up’ he focuses on these four elements in particular to arrive at the most conciseconceptualization <strong>of</strong> “<strong>The</strong> Art <strong>of</strong> Success”. According to Boyd, the message thus far isthat 138 : He who is willing <strong>and</strong> able to take the initiative to exploit variety, rapidity, <strong>and</strong> harmony –as basis to create as well as adapt to the more indistinct - more irregular – quicker changes<strong>of</strong> rhythm <strong>and</strong> pattern, yet shape focus <strong>and</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> effort – survives <strong>and</strong> dominates.or contrariwiseHe who is unwilling or unable to take the initiative to exploit variety, rapidity, <strong>and</strong>harmony…goes under or survives to be dominated.<strong>The</strong> Game, Boyd has pointed at, is to:Create tangles <strong>of</strong> threatening <strong>and</strong>/or non-threatening events/efforts as well as repeatedlygenerate mismatches between those events/efforts adversary observes or imagines(Cheng/Nebenpunkte) <strong>and</strong> those he must react to (Ch’i/Schwerpunkt)as basis toPenetrate adversary organism to sever his moral bonds, disorient his mental images, disrupthis operations, <strong>and</strong> overload his system, as well as subvert, shatter, seize or otherwise137 Ibid, p.156.138 Ibid, p.174.228

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!