13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equilibrium <strong>and</strong> evolve constantly, that marks the new paradigm, which should be consideredwhen reading Boyd.An early <strong>and</strong> influential work on chaos <strong>and</strong> complexity theory, following not longafter Capra’s <strong>The</strong> Tao <strong>of</strong> Physics was authored by Eric Jantsch, titled <strong>The</strong> Self-organizing Universe(1980). He states that ‘the central aspects <strong>of</strong> the emerging paradigm <strong>of</strong> self-organization are:primo, a specific macroscopic dynamics <strong>of</strong> process systems; secundo, continuous exchange <strong>and</strong>thereby co-evolution with the environment, <strong>and</strong> tertio, self-transcendence, the evolution <strong>of</strong>evolutionary processes’ 4 . This second stage in the shift in paradigm has had an obvious <strong>and</strong>demonstrable influence on Boyd. Boyd was not only very aware how science “works”,develops <strong>and</strong> grows through his reading <strong>of</strong> the works <strong>of</strong> Conant, Heisenberg, Gödel, Kuhn<strong>and</strong> other books on the philosophy <strong>of</strong> science. Boyd was also conscious <strong>of</strong> the changes inscience occurring around him during the three decades he developed his ideas on war <strong>and</strong>strategy. He devoured popular scientific studies describing the scientific developmentsduring his own time. For instance the list <strong>of</strong> sources used for Patterns <strong>of</strong> Conflict shows he readHoyle’s work <strong>The</strong> New Face <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>, as noted before the immensely influential book Order out<strong>of</strong> Chaos by Nobel laureate Ilya Prigogine <strong>and</strong> Isabelle Stengers <strong>and</strong> Fritj<strong>of</strong> Capra’s <strong>The</strong> Tao <strong>of</strong>Physics, as well as various other works on entropy, the science <strong>of</strong> the mind <strong>and</strong> evolution(including as already stated Richard Dawkin’s <strong>The</strong> Selfish Gene). <strong>The</strong> list <strong>of</strong> personal papersincludes moreover annotated early works that described this development, such asJohn Briggs <strong>and</strong> F.David Peat; Looking Glass Universe: <strong>The</strong> Emerging <strong>Science</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wholeness (1984)Ernst Mayr; <strong>The</strong> Growth <strong>of</strong> Biological Thought (1982)Heinz Pagels; <strong>The</strong> Cosmic Code: Quantum Physics as the Language <strong>of</strong> Nature (1982)Heinz Pagels; <strong>The</strong> Dreams <strong>of</strong> Reason: <strong>The</strong> Computer <strong>and</strong> the Rise <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Science</strong>s <strong>of</strong> Complexity (1988)Nick Herbert; Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics (1987)James Gleick; Chaos: Making a New <strong>Science</strong> (1987)Jeremy Rifkin; Entropy: A New World View (1980)Alex<strong>and</strong>er Woodcock <strong>and</strong> Monte Davis; Catastrophe <strong>The</strong>ory (1980)Fred Alan Wolf; Star Wave, Mind, Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Quantum Physics (1984)Gary Zukav; <strong>The</strong> Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview <strong>of</strong> the New Physics (1979)<strong>The</strong> works he was reading <strong>and</strong> re-reading at the time <strong>of</strong> his death are almost exclusivelyconcerned with the ‘new sciences’ as they are sometimes referred to. In several <strong>of</strong> thesebooks, <strong>of</strong> which several have become bestsellers, the shift in paradigm, the contours <strong>of</strong>which Bertalanffy already discerned, is laid out in full. <strong>The</strong>y give accessible accounts <strong>of</strong>scientific developments in various disciplines, ranging from artificial intelligence, quantumphysics, cosmology, biology, neurophysiology <strong>and</strong> genetics.Common to these books is that they lay out the inadequacy <strong>of</strong> the deterministic,mechanistic, reductionist Newtonian view <strong>of</strong> the world. Most <strong>of</strong> them refer to Einstein,Heisenberg, Gödel, Bertalanffy <strong>and</strong> Prigogine <strong>and</strong> describe in detail the concepts <strong>and</strong>discoveries concisely described above. In addition, all <strong>of</strong> them build upon the systemtheoretical view <strong>and</strong> refine the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> dynamical systems. <strong>The</strong>y describe newconcepts to explain systems behavior. Combined, they form a new ‘world view <strong>of</strong>descriptors’. In this chapter a number <strong>of</strong> key concepts that feature prominently in thesebooks <strong>and</strong> that combined form the emerging ‘worldview’, will be described. For an initialimpression <strong>of</strong> what the emerging worldview entails, the list <strong>of</strong> keywords below is included 5 .4 Erich Jantsch, <strong>The</strong> Self-Organizing Universe, Scientific <strong>and</strong> Human Implications <strong>of</strong> the Emerging Paradigm <strong>of</strong>Evolution, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980, p.9.5 Adapted from Eric B. Dent, 'Complexity <strong>Science</strong>: A Worldview Shift', Emergence, Vol. 1, issue 4(1999), p.8123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!