13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

snapshots, or “samples from historical environment”. He <strong>of</strong>fers nine citations from ninepractitioners (including himself) 6 :Sun Tzu (around 400 BC)Probe enemy strength to unmask his strengths,weaknesses, patterns <strong>of</strong> movement <strong>and</strong> intentions.Shape enemy's perception <strong>of</strong> world to maipulate/undermine his plans <strong>and</strong> actions. EmployCheng/Ch'I maneuvers to quickly <strong>and</strong> unexpectedlyhurl strength against weaknesses.Bourcet (1764-71)A plan ought to have several branches…Oneshould…mislead the enemy <strong>and</strong> make him imaginethat the main effort is coming at some other part.And…one muist be ready to pr<strong>of</strong>it by a second orthird branch <strong>of</strong> the plan without giving one's enemytime to consider it.Napoleon (early 1800's)<strong>Strategy</strong> is the art <strong>of</strong> making use <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong> space. Iam less chary <strong>of</strong> the latter than the former. Space wecan recover, time never. I may lose a battle, but Ishall never lose a minute. <strong>The</strong> whole art <strong>of</strong> warconsists in a well reasoned <strong>and</strong> circumspectdefensive, followed by rapid <strong>and</strong> audacious attack.Clausewitz (1832)Friction (which includes the interaction <strong>of</strong> manyfactors, such as uncertainty, psychological/moralforces <strong>and</strong> effects, etc.) impedes activity. Friction isthe only concept that more or less corresponds tothe factors that distinguish real war from war onpaper. In this sense, friction represents the climateor atmosphere <strong>of</strong> war.Jomini (1836)By free <strong>and</strong> rapid movements carry bulk <strong>of</strong> theforces (successively) against fractions <strong>of</strong> theenemy.N.B. Forrest (1860's)Git thar the fustest with the mostestBlumentritt (1947)<strong>The</strong> entire operational <strong>and</strong> tactical leadershipmethod hinged upon …rapid conciseassessment <strong>of</strong> situations,…<strong>and</strong> quick decision<strong>and</strong> quick execution, on the principle: eachminute ahead <strong>of</strong> the enemy is an advantage.Balck (1980)Emphasis upon creation <strong>of</strong> implicitconnections or bonds based upon trust, notmistrust, that permit wide freedom forsubordinates to exercise imagination <strong>and</strong>initiative--yet harmonize within intent <strong>of</strong>superior comm<strong>and</strong>ers. Benefit: internalsimplicity that permits rapid adaptability.Yours trulyOperate insde adversary's observationorientation-decision-actionloops to enmeshadversary in a world <strong>of</strong> uncertainty, doubt,mistrust, confusion, disorder, fear, panic,chaos,…<strong>and</strong>/or fold adversary back insidehimself so that he cannot cope withevents/efforts as they unfold.<strong>The</strong> key points Boyd derives from these quotations are that (1) the atmosphere <strong>of</strong> war isfriction; (2) friction is generated <strong>and</strong> magnified by menace, ambiguity, deception, rapidity,uncertainty, mistrust, etc.; (3) friction is diminished by implicit underst<strong>and</strong>ing, trust,cooperation, simplicity, focus, etc.; <strong>and</strong> (4) in this sense, variety <strong>and</strong> rapidity tend to magnifyfriction, while harmony <strong>and</strong> initiative tend to diminish friction 7 . In other words, withoutharmony <strong>and</strong> initiative, variety <strong>and</strong> rapidity lead to confusion <strong>and</strong> disorder. Harmony <strong>and</strong>initiative without variety <strong>and</strong> rapidity lead to rigid uniformity <strong>and</strong> predictability <strong>and</strong> ultimatelyto non-adaptability. <strong>The</strong> problem for any comm<strong>and</strong> concept then becomes to find an answerto the question how to generate harmony/initiative so that one can exploit variety/rapidity.Boyd comments on that question by suggesting that we must uncover those interactions thatfoster harmony <strong>and</strong> initiative yet do not destroy variety <strong>and</strong> rapidity 8 .6 Ibid, pp.7-8.7 Ibid, p.8.8 Ibid, p. 9.235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!