13.07.2015 Views

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

Science, Strategy and War The Strategic Theory of ... - Boekje Pienter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. ON STRATEGY AND STRATEGIC THEORYSo long as war is a possibility the discipline concerning its use is indispensable to sovereign groups that are tosurvive.Quincy Wright 1What is strategy? A mental tapestry <strong>of</strong> changing intentions for harmonizing <strong>and</strong> focusing our efforts as abasis for realizing some aim or purpose in an unfolding <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten unforeseen world <strong>of</strong> many bewildering events<strong>and</strong> many contending interests.John Boyd<strong>Strategy</strong>Introduction<strong>The</strong> core subject <strong>of</strong> his study concerns a comprehensive theory about success <strong>and</strong> failure inconflict. A Discourse on Winning <strong>and</strong> Losing examines how organizations can be effective inconflict, how they can win, or loose, or in the words <strong>of</strong> John Boyd, how they can ‘survive<strong>and</strong> prosper’, <strong>and</strong> ‘improve our ability to shape <strong>and</strong> adapt to unfolding circumstances, so thatwe (as individuals or as groups or as a culture or as a nation-state) can survive on our ownterms’ 2 . In military terms this conflict is called war. But A Discourse also looks beyond war<strong>and</strong> into organizational behavior under adversarial conditions in general, as the epitaph byBoyd already suggests. This means that military theory, operational art, military strategy,strategic theory <strong>and</strong> thinking strategically in general are key terms defining the content <strong>of</strong> thisstudy. <strong>The</strong>se terms are not self explanatory nor is it generally appreciated what the specificcharacter is <strong>of</strong> strategic theory as theory, <strong>and</strong> which peculiar inherent difficulties are attachedto developing strategic theory, nor indeed, what sources <strong>of</strong> inspiration – formative factors –generally influence the development <strong>of</strong> a strategic theory. For underst<strong>and</strong>ing the nature <strong>of</strong>John Boyd’s endavour an introduction on the nature <strong>of</strong> the subject <strong>of</strong> this study is necessary.It will illuminate the subject matter Boyd was concerned with; it will show the specificcharacter <strong>of</strong> strategic theory <strong>and</strong> it will lead toward an appreciation concerning the criteriathat may be applied in judging innovations in strategic theory. Moreover, it will introduce theconcept <strong>of</strong> formative factors <strong>of</strong> strategic theory which underlies the subsequent chapters thatdescribe the various sources <strong>of</strong> inspiration <strong>and</strong> motivation behind Boyd’s work.1 Quincy Wright, <strong>The</strong> Study <strong>of</strong> International Relations (New York, 1955), p.155.2 John Boyd, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Strategic</strong> Game <strong>of</strong> ? <strong>and</strong> ?, p.58.13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!