13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IntroductionThe essays contained in this volume have the ambitious aim <strong>of</strong> bringingsome fresh air to the philosophy <strong>of</strong> mathematics. Contemporary philosophy <strong>of</strong>mathematics <strong>of</strong>fers us an embarrassment <strong>of</strong> riches. Anyone even partially familiarwith it is certainly aware <strong>of</strong> the recent work on neo-logicism, nominalism,indispensability arguments, structuralism, and so on. Much <strong>of</strong> this work can beseen as an attempt to address a set <strong>of</strong> epistemological and ontological problemsthat were raised with great lucidity in two classic articles by Paul Benacerraf.Benacerraf’s articles have been rightly quite influential, but their influence hasalso had the unwelcome consequence <strong>of</strong> crowding other important topics <strong>of</strong>fthe table. In particular, the agenda set by Benacerraf’s writings for philosophy<strong>of</strong> mathematics was that <strong>of</strong> explaining how, if there are abstract objects, wecould have access to them. And this, by and large, has been the problemthat philosophers <strong>of</strong> mathematics have been pursuing for the last fifty years.Another consequence <strong>of</strong> the way in which the discussion has been framed isthat no particular attention to mathematical practice seemed to be requiredto be an epistemologist <strong>of</strong> mathematics. After all, the issue <strong>of</strong> abstract objectsconfronts us already at the most elementary levels <strong>of</strong> arithmetic, geometry,and set theory. It would seem that paying attention to other branches <strong>of</strong>mathematics is irrelevant for solving the key problems <strong>of</strong> the discipline. Thisengendered an extremely narrow view <strong>of</strong> mathematical epistemology withinmainstream philosophy <strong>of</strong> mathematics, due partly to the over-emphasis onontological questions.The authors in this collection believe that the single-minded focus on theproblem <strong>of</strong> ‘access’ has reduced the epistemology <strong>of</strong> mathematics to a torso.They believe that the epistemology <strong>of</strong> mathematics needs to be extendedwell beyond its present confines to address epistemological issues having todo with fruitfulness, evidence, visualization, diagrammatic reasoning, understanding,explanation, and other aspects <strong>of</strong> mathematical epistemology which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!