13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 paolo mancosufruitfulness in unifying a wide group <strong>of</strong> results or by opening unexpectednew vistas. But when mathematicians appeal to such virtues <strong>of</strong> concepts(fruitfulness, naturalness, etc.) are they simply displaying subjective tastes orare there objective features, which can be subjected to philosophical analysis,which can account for the rationality and objectivity <strong>of</strong> such judgments? This isthe topic <strong>of</strong> the introductory chapter on Concepts and Definitions writtenby Jamie Tappenden (University <strong>of</strong> Michigan) who has already published onthese topics in relation to geometry and complex analysis in the 19th century.His research paper ties the topic to discussions on naturalness in contemporarymetaphysics and then discusses Riemann’s conceptual approach to analysis asan example from mathematical practice in which the natural definitions giverise to fruitful results.The influence <strong>of</strong> Computer Science on contemporary mathematics hasalready been mentioned in connection with visualization. But uses <strong>of</strong> thecomputer are now pervasive in contemporary mathematics, and some <strong>of</strong> theaspects <strong>of</strong> this influence, such as the computer pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the four-color theorem,have been sensationally popularized. Computers provide an aid to mathematicaldiscovery; they provide experimental, inductive confirmation <strong>of</strong> mathematicalhypotheses; they carry out calculations that are needed in pro<strong>of</strong>s; and theyenable one to obtain formal verification <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>s. In the introduction to thissection, Jeremy Avigad (Carnegie Mellon University) addresses the challengesthat philosophy will have to meet when addressing these new developments.In particular, he calls for an extension <strong>of</strong> ordinary epistemology <strong>of</strong> mathematicsthat will address issues that the use <strong>of</strong> computers in mathematics make urgent,such as the problem <strong>of</strong> characterizing mathematical evidence and mathematicalunderstanding. In his research paper he then goes on to focus on mathematicalunderstanding and here, in an interesting reversal <strong>of</strong> perspective, he showshow formal verification can assist us in developing an account <strong>of</strong> mathematicalunderstanding, thereby showing that the epistemology <strong>of</strong> mathematics caninform and be informed by research in computer science.Some <strong>of</strong> the most spectacular conceptual achievements in 20th centurymathematics are related to the developments <strong>of</strong> Category Theory and itsrole in areas such as algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, and homologicalalgebra. Category theory has interest for the philosopher <strong>of</strong> mathematics bothon account <strong>of</strong> the claim made on its behalf as an alternative foundationalframework for all <strong>of</strong> mathematics (alternative to Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory)as well as for its power <strong>of</strong> unification and its fruitfulness revealed in the abovementionedareas. Colin McLarty (Case Western Reserve University) devoteshis introduction to spelling out how the structuralism involved in muchcontemporary mathematical practice threatens certain reductionist projects

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!