13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

388 colin mclartycongruent modulo X 2 + Y 2 − 1, writtenif and only ifP(X, Y) ≡ Q(X, Y) (mod X 2 + Y 2 − 1)Q(X, Y) − P(X, Y) is divisible by X 2 + Y 2 − 1A coordinate function on the space is a congruence class <strong>of</strong> polynomials. Forexample X 2 Y defines a coordinate function on this space, the same functionas Y − Y 3 , since light calculation shows(X 2 Y) − (Y − Y 3 ) = Y.(X 2 + Y 2 − 1)Altogether the ring <strong>of</strong> coordinate functions is the ring <strong>of</strong> integer polynomialsin two variables, Z[X, Y], modulo X 2 + Y 2 − 1, i.e. it is the quotientringZ[X, Y]/(X 2 + Y 2 − 1)These ‘functions’ are constructed from integer polynomials just as Kroneckerwould construct irrationals as in Section 14.1.1.The next step is to use the functions to define points <strong>of</strong> this space. Themotivation is that each point p should have a set <strong>of</strong> functionsp ⊆ Z[X, Y]/(X 2 + Y 2 − 1)which take value 0 at p. This set should be an ideal, closed under addition andunder multiplication by arbitrary functions. That is, if the functions P 1 (X, Y)and P 2 (X, Y) are both construed as taking value 0 at p then P 1 (X, Y) +P 2 (X, Y) must also be; and so must the product R(X, Y) · P 1 (X, Y) for anypolynomial R(X, Y). Further, the ideal should be prime, in the sense thatwhenever a product lies in then at least one factor already lies in it.¹⁷ Moreformally:If P 1 (X, Y) · P 2 (X, Y) ∈ then either P 1 (X, Y) ∈ or P 2 (X, Y) ∈ .Scheme theory demands no more than that for a point. It says there is apoint for each prime ideal. Textbooks say the points are the prime ideals. Soour space has a point for each integer solution a, b ∈ Z to Equation (14.3), butalso a point for the mod 7 solution 2, 5 ∈ Z/(7). It has one point combining¹⁷ This expresses the idea that if a product is 0 then at least one factor must be—which does not holdin every ring—but this definition makes it hold for function values at points <strong>of</strong> a scheme.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!