13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

understanding pro<strong>of</strong>s 351Mathematics guides our thought in deep and powerful ways, and deserves aphilosophy that recognizes that fact. When we focus on particular features <strong>of</strong>mathematical practice, metaphysical concerns <strong>of</strong>ten seem petty and irrelevant,and we find, instead, a rich assortment <strong>of</strong> issues that have concrete bearingupon what we do and say about the subject. Our task is to develop a conceptualframework in which we can fruitfully begin to address these issues, and tonarrow our focus to the point where discernible progress can be made. I hopethe present chapter serves as encouragement.Added in Pro<strong>of</strong>. After the article had been sent to the publisher, I came acrosswork by Jody Azzouni which bears directly on many <strong>of</strong> the issues raised here.Although, I cannot explore the points <strong>of</strong> agreement and disagreement now,the reader may wish to compare my views to those <strong>of</strong> Azzouni (2005) andAzzoumi (2006).BibliographyAigner,MartinandZiegler,Günter M. (2001), Pro<strong>of</strong>s from The Book, 2nd edn (Berlin:Springer-Verlag).Avigad, Jeremy (2006), ‘<strong>Mathematical</strong> method and pro<strong>of</strong>’, Synthese, 153, 105–159.Avigad, Jeremy, Donnelly, Kevin, Gray, David, and Raff, Paul(2007) ‘A formallyverified pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the prime number theorem’, ACM Transactions on ComputationalLogic, 9(1:2).Avigad, Jeremy and Friedman, Harvey(2006), ‘Combining decision procedures forthe reals’, Logical Methods in Computer Science, 2(4:4).Azzoumi, Jody(2005), ‘Is there a sense in which mathematics can have foundations?’In G. Sica (ed.), Essays in the Foundations <strong>of</strong> Mathematics and Logic, 9–47 (Monza:Polimetrica).(2006), Tracking Reason: Pro<strong>of</strong>, Consequence, and Truth (<strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong>University Press).Ballarin, Clemens(2006), ‘Interpretation <strong>of</strong> locales in Isabelle: theories and pro<strong>of</strong>contexts’, in J. M. Borwein and W. M. Farmer (eds.), <strong>Mathematical</strong> Knowledge Management:Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Fifth International Conference, MKM 2006, 31–43 (Berlin:Springer-Verlag).Beeson, Michael (1998), ‘Design principles <strong>of</strong> Mathpert: s<strong>of</strong>tware to support educationin algebra and calculus’, in N. Kajler (ed.), Computer—Human Interaction in SymbolicComputation, 89–115 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).Bertot, YvesandCastéran, Pierre (2004), Interactive Theorem Proving and ProgramDevelopment: Coq’art: the Calculus <strong>of</strong> Inductive Constructions (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).Bos, HenkJ.M.(2000), Redefining Geometrical Exactness: Descartes’ Transformation <strong>of</strong> theEarly Modern Concept <strong>of</strong> Construction (New York: Springer-Verlag).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!