13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

320 jeremy avigadIn that respect, logic does not tell us the whole story:Logic teaches us that on such and such a road we are sure <strong>of</strong> not meeting anobstacle; it does not tell us which is the road that leads to the desired end. (Ibid.,pp. 129–130)Philosophers <strong>of</strong> science commonly distinguish between the ‘logic <strong>of</strong> justification’and the ‘logic <strong>of</strong> discovery’. Factors that guide the process <strong>of</strong> discoveryalso fall under the general category <strong>of</strong> ‘understanding’, and, indeed, understandingand discovery are <strong>of</strong>ten linked. For example, understanding a pro<strong>of</strong>may involve, in part, seeing how the pro<strong>of</strong> could have been discovered; or, atleast, seeing how the train <strong>of</strong> inferences could have been anticipated.It seems to me, then, as I repeat an argument I have learned, that I could havediscovered it. This is <strong>of</strong>ten only an illusion; but even then, even if I am not cleverenough to create for myself, I rediscover it myself as I repeat it. (Ibid., PartI,Chapter III, p. 50)While knowing the relevant definitions may be enough to determine that apro<strong>of</strong> is correct, understanding is needed to find the definitions that make itpossible to discover a pro<strong>of</strong>. Poincaré characterized the process <strong>of</strong> discovery,in turn, as follows:Discovery consists precisely in not constructing useless combinations, but in constructingthose that are useful, which are an infinitely small minority. Discoveryis discernment, selection. (Ibid., p.51)These musings provide us with some helpful metaphors. Mathematicspresents us with a complex network <strong>of</strong> roads; understanding helps us navigatethem, and find the way to our destination. Mathematics presents us witha combinatorial explosion <strong>of</strong> options; understanding helps us sift throughthem, and pick out the ones that are worth pursuing. Without understanding,we are lost in confusion, wandering blindly, unable to cope. When we domathematics, we are like Melville’s sailors, swimming in a vast expanse. Just asthe sailors cling to sides <strong>of</strong> their ship, we rely on our understanding to guideus and support us.12.2 Understanding and abilityLet us see if we can work these metaphors into something more definite. Onething to notice is that there seems to be some sort <strong>of</strong> reciprocal relationshipbetween mathematics and understanding. That is, we speak <strong>of</strong> understanding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!