13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

mathematical concepts: fruitfulness and naturalness 299between choices <strong>of</strong> basic categories and the success <strong>of</strong> predictions (where thepredictions may be clearly stated conjectures or less specific expectations <strong>of</strong>‘fruitfulness’).) Finally, I sketched the Riemann–Dedekind account <strong>of</strong> ‘innercharacteristic properties’ as a promising example <strong>of</strong> a method, and a methodology,incorporating this insight. This methodology has the additional attractivefeature that in its details it resonates with the Port Royal Principle, sinceidentifiable mathematical cases drive it and give it substance. Of course, so farI’ve given only the roughest sketch <strong>of</strong> the Riemann–Dedekind account andthe mathematics informing it, and I’ve given only unargued hints about its relationshipto contemporary mathematical practice. In part this has been a function<strong>of</strong> space, but in part it is a necessity arising from the texts themselves. Riemannand Dedekind doled their methodological dicta out frugally. As mathematiciansare prone to do, they let their mathematics do most <strong>of</strong> the talking, whichleaves the philosopher/scribe a lot <strong>of</strong> detail to spell out. But this shouldn’t bea surprise: Arnauld and Nicole warned us that this is what to expect.BibliographyArmstrong, David M. (1986), ‘In Defence <strong>of</strong> Structural Universals’, Australasian Journal<strong>of</strong> <strong>Philosophy</strong>, 1, 85–88.(1989), Universals: An Opinionated Introduction (Boulder: Westview Press).Avigad, Jeremy (2006), ‘Methodology and Metaphysics in the Development <strong>of</strong>Dedekind’s Theory <strong>of</strong> Ideals’, in José Ferreirós and Jeremy Gray (eds.), The Architecture<strong>of</strong> Modern Mathematics (<strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong> University Press), pp. 159–186.Benacerraf, Paul(1965), ‘What Numbers Could Not Be’, The Philosophical Review,74(1), 47–73.Corfield, David (2003), The <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Real Mathematics (Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press).Cox, David (1988), ‘Quadratic Reciprocity: its Conjecture and Application’, TheAmerican <strong>Mathematical</strong> Monthly, 95(5), 442–448.(1989), Primes <strong>of</strong> the Form x 2 + ny 2 (New York: Wiley).Darrigol, Olivier(2005), Worlds <strong>of</strong> Flow: A History <strong>of</strong> Hydrodynamics from the Bernoullisto Prandtl (<strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong> University Press).Dedekind, Richard (1854), Über die Einfürung neuer Funktionen in der Mathematik,Habilitation lecture, Göttingen. Reprinted in Werke, III, pp. 428–438.(1877), Theory <strong>of</strong> Algebraic Integers, ed. and trans. John Stillwell (Cambridge <strong>Mathematical</strong>Library) Translation published 1996; originally published 1877.(1895), ‘Über die Begründung der Idealtheorie’, Nachrichten der KöniglichenGesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, 106–113. Reprinted in Werke, IIpp. 50–58.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!