13.07.2015 Views

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

Mancosu - Philosophy of Mathematical Practice (Oxford, 2008).pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the boundary between mathematics and physics 415discussed, material for philosophical thought on issues such as the growth<strong>of</strong> mathematical thought, the porous line between method <strong>of</strong> discovery andmethod <strong>of</strong> demonstration in mathematics and in physics, and issues <strong>of</strong> conceptformation in the mathematical and the physical sciences. Further philosophicalreflections on the process <strong>of</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> mathematical knowledge are to befound in the collection Grosholz and Breger (2000).Finally, many thought-provoking ideas on the relationship between mathematicsand physics are to be found in the writings <strong>of</strong> Sir Michael Atiyah,particularly in Volumes 1 and 6 <strong>of</strong> his Collected Works (Atiyah, 1998–2004).BibliographyAtiyah, Michael (1988–2004), Collected Works (6 vols) (<strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong> UniversityPress).Batterman, Robert W. (2002), The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning inExplanation, Reduction and Emergence (<strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong> University Press).(2005), ‘Response to Belot’s ‘‘Whose Devil? Which Details?’’ ’, <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong>Science, 72, 154–163.Belot, Gordon (2005), ‘Whose Devil? Which Details?’, <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Science, 72,128–153.Bourbaki, Nicolas (2004), Elements <strong>of</strong> Mathematics: Theory <strong>of</strong> Sets (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).Cartier, Pierre,Julia, Bernard,Moussa, Pierre,andVanhove, Pierre (eds.) (2006),Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry I: On Random Matrices, ZetaFunctions, and Dynamical Systems (New York: Springer-Verlag).Davey, Kevin (2003), ‘Is <strong>Mathematical</strong> Rigour Necessary in Physics?’, British Journalfor the <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> Science, 54, 439–463.Deligne, Pierre, Eting<strong>of</strong>, Pavel,Freed, Daniel S., Jeffrey, Lisa C., Kazhdan, David,Morgan, John W., Morrison, David R., and Witten, Edward (eds.) (1999),Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians (American <strong>Mathematical</strong>Society and The Institute for Advanced Study).Dyson, Freeman J. (1972), ‘Missed Opportunities’, Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the American <strong>Mathematical</strong>Society, 78, 635–652.Faddeev, L.D.(2006), ‘What Modern <strong>Mathematical</strong> Physics is Supposed to Be’, in<strong>Mathematical</strong> Events <strong>of</strong> the Twentieth Century (New York: Springer-Verlag) pp. 75–84.Fine,DanaandFine, Arthur (1997), ‘Gauge Theory, Anomalies and Global Geometry:The Interplay <strong>of</strong> Physics and Mathematics’, Studies in History and <strong>Philosophy</strong> <strong>of</strong> ModernPhysics, 28, 307–323.Fischer,K.H.andHertz,J.A.(1991), Spin Glasses (Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!