07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

principle holds concerning map-making. By letting the child make simple<br />

maps of well-known places, it not only learns to understand what a map<br />

is, it also learns to find its way from one position to another better.<br />

When the child is to have its first lessons in experimental physics,<br />

embodied action is also emphasized. The child should be encouraged to<br />

partake in the construction of the apparatus involved in the experiments.<br />

Not only does it then learn to use its hands skillfully, which may be useful<br />

later in life, but this way of learning also gives the child the chance to<br />

further perfect its senses.<br />

The most palpable advantage of these slow and laborious researches<br />

is that they keep the body active and the limbs supple during<br />

speculative studies and continuously form the hands for the work and<br />

the practices useful to man. All the instruments invented to guide us<br />

in our experiments and to take the place of accuracy of the senses<br />

cause the senses to be neglected. 26<br />

I introduced this paragraph by claiming that in Émile Rousseau puts<br />

forward an embodied pragmatism, but what exactly is this embodied<br />

pragmatism? The pragmatic aspect of Rousseau’s theory is most easily<br />

seen, perhaps, by the fact that in all his learning, Émile is encouraged to<br />

become master of practical skills useful in his daily life. Also, Rousseau<br />

vehemently attacks the traditional knowledge of the schools and the<br />

abstract knowledge of books. This knowledge is, in the end, next to<br />

useless.<br />

Even if he does not coin a separate term for it, I think Rousseau, in<br />

his emphasis on practical skills, may be said to promote a pragmatic<br />

theory of rationality. In this theory, not only do the practical skills of<br />

everyday life count as forms of knowledge, but this knowledge is<br />

conceived of as a form of knowledge superior to the theoretical<br />

knowledge of the schools. If we are to express the same point in<br />

Aristotelian terms, we may say that Rousseau turns the Aristotelian<br />

hierarchy of the sciences upside down. The episteme of the theoretical<br />

sciences is no longer regarded as a superior form of knowledge. Its<br />

superior position is now taken by the techné of the productive sciences.<br />

As for Rousseau’s embodied perspective, it is present not only as the<br />

trivial idea that education should include the cultivation of the body, but<br />

I think Rousseau’s idea of embodiment goes much deeper, signaled by<br />

his tendency to equate embodied and rational development. The child’s<br />

26 Ibid., 176.<br />

RATIONALITY <strong>AND</strong> EMBODIED <strong>PRACTICE</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!