07.12.2012 Views

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

BODY AND PRACTICE IN KANT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236<br />

THE <strong>BODY</strong> <strong>AND</strong> THE TRANSCENDENTAL<br />

embodied mind is a basic element of his anti-skeptical strategy, even if he<br />

does not stress that point himself. I shall say more on this in due course.<br />

First, however, let us notice that it is far from obvious that the notion<br />

of human embodiment can be used in a strategy to fight skepticism. On<br />

the contrary, the notion itself seems to be vulnerable to skepticism. I have<br />

argued that Kantian representationalism follows from a reflection<br />

starting out from the idea that human existence is radically embodied. It<br />

is possible to argue, however, that by following this reflection to the end,<br />

the very notion of embodiment is undermined. If we accept that<br />

everything that we represent as being outside us is some kind of<br />

construction made on the basis of information present to our embodied<br />

minds, then it seems to follow that what I call my body is such a<br />

construction too. When I observe my arm, my legs, and other parts of my<br />

body, then my body appears to me in space along with all the other<br />

empirical objects of my empirical world. If these are representational<br />

constructions, must not my body also be such a construction? If so, do I<br />

have any privileged knowledge of it? Can I know that what I take to be<br />

my body is really my body? Can I know that this body is where my mind<br />

is? It may seem as if all these questions have to be answered negatively. If<br />

so, then the very idea that the mind is embodied undermines itself, or so<br />

it seems.<br />

The problem is not a trivial one. When I observe my body from the<br />

outside, for instance, if I look at one of my arms, then it has the same<br />

epistemic status as other objects in my environment, and as such I have<br />

no privileged epistemic access to it. However, the knowledge I have of<br />

my body is not derived just from the knowledge I have from observing it<br />

from the outside. I also know my body from the inside, and this<br />

knowledge is immediate in a sense that my knowledge derived from<br />

external observation is not. 21<br />

Now, what kind of knowledge is this<br />

immediate knowledge? What can it tell about myself? Does it tell me I<br />

am embodied?<br />

Before I answer this question let me emphasize, as I have done<br />

before, that what I here call ‘immediate knowledge’ is not identical with<br />

our normal state of consciousness. So the answer to the question just put<br />

is not found by asking what we actually feel inside at some particular<br />

moment. It is found by asking what it is possible to know, and what not,<br />

when we start to reflect upon human embodiment. With this in mind, let<br />

us proceed.<br />

21<br />

Kaulbach (1968), 285 expresses this point beautifully: ‘Der Leib ist<br />

unmittelbare Gegenwart. Er ist mir, raumlich gesprochen, das Nächste.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!